A New Look at the Opponents’ Arguments against Women Judgeship Arguments by Al-sī ra, Principle, and Consensus

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOROVATI SOHRAB; zargosh nasab bdoljabar

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES) Year:2018 | Volume:9 | Issue:3 (25) Page(s): 141-160

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

219

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A New Look at the Opponents’ Arguments against Women Judgeship Arguments by Al-sī ra, Principle, and Consensus

Author(s)

MOROVATI SOHRAB | zargosh nasab bdoljabar | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Al-sīraQ2

Principle and ConsensusQ1

women judgeshipQ2

Abstract

In this research, we address the arguments against women judgeship which are usually based on Al-sī ra (the biography or method of life of Prophet or Imams), consensus and principle, and since they consider manhood as the requirement of judgeship, we attempt to reasonably criticize the arguments. This paper emphasizes that 1) the sī ra is influenced by the cultural and environmental causes and factors so it cannot be construed as a proof; (2) in all conditions and respects the principle is permissibility, not prohibition. Besides, from the narrations saying ‘ refer to wise persons’ one can infer that women are also qualified candidates since the sayings did not restrict wises category to men only; (3) the consensus is not considered as a valid proof by the Shiite unless it is intended to discover Imam's judgment. The findings of the research show that opponents’ arguments against women judgeship are invalid and unreliable.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOROVATI, SOHRAB, & zargosh nasab, bdoljabar. (2018). A New Look at the Opponents’ Arguments against Women Judgeship Arguments by Al-sī ra, Principle, and Consensus. PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES), 9(3 (25) ), 141-160. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/381353/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOROVATI SOHRAB, zargosh nasab bdoljabar. A New Look at the Opponents’ Arguments against Women Judgeship Arguments by Al-sī ra, Principle, and Consensus. PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES)[Internet]. 2018;9(3 (25) ):141-160. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/381353/en

IEEE: Copy

SOHRAB MOROVATI, and bdoljabar zargosh nasab, “A New Look at the Opponents’ Arguments against Women Judgeship Arguments by Al-sī ra, Principle, and Consensus,” PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES), vol. 9, no. 3 (25) , pp. 141–160, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/381353/en

Related Journal Papers