مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

4,068
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING HYDROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTROSALPINGOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE UTERINE CAVITY DISEASES IN INFERTILE WOMEN

Pages

  671-677

Keywords

HYDRO (HYSTERO) SONOGRAPHYQ4

Abstract

 Introduction: uterine cavity diseases are a major cause of INFERTILITY with a 10-15% prevalence among infertile couples. Uterine cavity abnormalities are classified as: polypoid lesions (polyps or myomas), maternal anomalies (eg. bicornate or septate uterus) and intrauterine adhesions. So it is reasonable to achieve a diagnostic procedure with a high accuracy and low cost and side effects. The purpose of this study was the comparison between HSG(I)and HDS and the gold standard was HYSTEROSCOPY.Materials and methods: in this prospective study, 45 infertile patient who referred to Mirza Koochak Khan Hospital were underwent HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY (HSG), hydrosonography (HDS) and hystroscopy. Hydrosonography was carried out by the use of a foley catheter (French 8). Saline solution was slowly infused to distend the uterine cavity and the cavity was assessed by transvaginal sonography.Results: HYSTEROSCOPY found 34 cases, normal and uterine cavity abnormalities were as the following: Polyloid lesions (7cases), intrauterine adhesions (2 cases) and bicornate uterus (2 cases). Based on these results, HSG procedure had incorrect results in 7 of 45(15.6%) cases, 82% sensitivity, 85%specificity, 64% positive predictive value PPV and 94%negative predictive value (NPV). Whereas HDS had only one case with incorrect result (2/2%). As a matter of fact HDS had a diagnostic accuracy of 98% versus 84% for HSG.Conclusion:This study confirmed the superiority of hydrosonography to HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY iq evaluation of uterine cavity diseases, due to higher diagnostic accuracy for HDS.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHASEMYNEZHAD, A., GOUGOL, N., & AZMOODEH, O.. (2004). COMPARING HYDROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTROSALPINGOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE UTERINE CAVITY DISEASES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 62(8), 671-677. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38277/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHASEMYNEZHAD A., GOUGOL N., AZMOODEH O.. COMPARING HYDROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTROSALPINGOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE UTERINE CAVITY DISEASES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2004;62(8):671-677. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38277/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. GHASEMYNEZHAD, N. GOUGOL, and O. AZMOODEH, “COMPARING HYDROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTROSALPINGOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE UTERINE CAVITY DISEASES IN INFERTILE WOMEN,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 671–677, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38277/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top