مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

6,236
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POST HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN CONTROL: RECTAL DICLOFENAC VERSUS ACETAMINOPHEN

Pages

  926-930

Abstract

 Background: Anal surgeries are prevalent, but they didn’t perform as outpatient surgeries because of concerns about postoperative PAIN. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of rectal ACETAMINOPHEN and DICLOFENAC on postoperative analgesia after anal surgeries in adult patients.Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study 60 ASA class I or II scheduled for haemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure or fistula repair, were randomized (with block randomization method) to receive either a single dose of 650 mg rectal ACETAMINOPHEN (n=20), 100 mg rectal DICLOFENAC (n=20) or placebo suppositories (n=20) after the operation. The severity of PAIN, time to first request of analgesic agent after administration of suppositories and complications were compared between three groups. PAIN scores were evaluated in patients by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 0 (after complete consciousness in recovery), 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The period between administration of the suppositories and the patients’ first request to receive analgesic was compared between groups.Results: PAIN scores were lower significantly in rectal DICLOFENAC than the other groups. The period between administration of the suppositories and the patients’ first request to receive analgesic in DICLOFENAC group was 219±73 minutes, was significantly longer compared with placebo (153±47 minutes) and ACETAMINOPHEN (178±64 minutes) groups. No complications were reported. Conclusions: DICLOFENAC SUPPOSITORY is more effective than ACETAMINOPHEN SUPPOSITORY in post HEMORRHOIDectomy PAIN management.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAHIMI, MOZHGAN, MAKAREM, J., & MAKTOUBI, M.. (2009). POST HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN CONTROL: RECTAL DICLOFENAC VERSUS ACETAMINOPHEN. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 66(12), 926-930. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38357/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAHIMI MOZHGAN, MAKAREM J., MAKTOUBI M.. POST HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN CONTROL: RECTAL DICLOFENAC VERSUS ACETAMINOPHEN. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2009;66(12):926-930. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38357/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOZHGAN RAHIMI, J. MAKAREM, and M. MAKTOUBI, “POST HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PAIN CONTROL: RECTAL DICLOFENAC VERSUS ACETAMINOPHEN,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 926–930, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38357/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button