A COMPARISON OF METOCLOPRAMIDE AND LIDOCAINE FOR PREVENTING PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOVAFEGH A.; MIR ESKANDARI M.; EGHTESADI ARAGHI P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ) Year:2003 | Volume:61 | Issue:4 Page(s): 274-280

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

691

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF METOCLOPRAMIDE AND LIDOCAINE FOR PREVENTING PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL

Author(s)

MOVAFEGH A. | MIR ESKANDARI M. | EGHTESADI ARAGHI P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ANESTHESIAQ4

LIDOCAINEQ4

METOCLOPROMIDEQ4

PAIN PREVALENCE AND PAIN SEVERITY OF PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOLQ4

Abstract

Background: One of the disturbing complications of propofol is pain on injection and the incidence ranges from 28% to 90%. METOCLOPROMIDE is commonly used as an anti emetic drug. Some investigators reported that this drug could reduce the pain on injection of propofol. The aim of this study was to assess and comparison of the efficacy of propofol pretreatment with METOCLOPROMIDE in incidence and severity of its pain on injection. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, prospective, double-blinded, placebocontrolled trail, 150 patients 18 to 40 yr old were randomly allocated in one three groups. C group (2ml of normal saline), L group (40mg LIDOCAINE in 2ml), M group (10mg METOCLOPROMIDE in 2ml). Immediately after injection of study or placebo drugs, 10 mg of propofol with injection rate of 0.5 ml/s (In 4 Seconds) were injected in to the same vein that was inserted to the most prominent dorsal hand vein. Pain severity was measured using Visual Analogue Pain Scale that were educated to the patients before the trail (0 for no pain and 100 for the most aggressive pain in life) and values other than zero was encountered pain appearance. Patients with signs of sedation were excluded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between patients in three groups in number of men and women (P = 0.66), age (P = 0.29) and weight (P = 0.49). Furthermore severity (P=differences (C = 41.18, L = 25.4 and M = 13.1, P<0.001) and patients in METOCLOPROMIDE group experiences lower pain than other two groups (P<0.001). Pain incidence in Control group was 77.1% and it was significantly reduced in LIDOCAINE and METOCLOPROMIDE group (P = 0.002), but there were no significant difference between them (P = 0.051). The 0.69) and incidence (P = 0.29) of pain has no significant difference between men and women. Pain severity between three groups has significant results showed that METOCLOPROMIDE could significantly reduce the severity of pain on injection of propofol more than LIDOCAINE (opposite to diazepam), but they had no difference in pain incidence. It might lie on the different mechanisms that they produce pain. Pain on injection of diazepam is primarily attributed to propylene glycol, as a vehicle, but the pain mechanism in propofol is remaining unknown. Conclusion: Finally as regards to other useful effects of METOCLOPROMIDE including postoperative nausea and vomiting and propofol induction dose reduction, especially when there is a medical condition where LIDOCAINE is contraindicated, it may be a reasonable alternative before injection of propofol.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOVAFEGH, A., MIR ESKANDARI, M., & EGHTESADI ARAGHI, P.. (2003). A COMPARISON OF METOCLOPRAMIDE AND LIDOCAINE FOR PREVENTING PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 61(4), 274-280. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38368/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOVAFEGH A., MIR ESKANDARI M., EGHTESADI ARAGHI P.. A COMPARISON OF METOCLOPRAMIDE AND LIDOCAINE FOR PREVENTING PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2003;61(4):274-280. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38368/en

IEEE: Copy

A. MOVAFEGH, M. MIR ESKANDARI, and P. EGHTESADI ARAGHI, “A COMPARISON OF METOCLOPRAMIDE AND LIDOCAINE FOR PREVENTING PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 274–280, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38368/en

Related Journal Papers