مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,339
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Literary Metaphor and the Conceptual Metaphor

Author(s)

 Hassanzadeh Niri Mohammadhassan | Hamidfar AliAsghar | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  1-23

Abstract

 It has been about four decades since George Lakoff and Mark Johnson brought up the notion of Conceptual metaphor in their book Metaphors We Live By (1980). Since then, this theory has found numerous followers and accordingly it has been applied to Persian linguistic and literary researches as well. This essay contends that these two thinkers were not in fact the originator of Conceptual metaphor and that, as Richards says, the theorization of this type of metaphor goes back to the olden times. The article attempts to compare literary and Conceptual metaphor through the thoughts of Islamic and western masters of eloquence and the definitions of literary and Conceptual metaphor that they have given in order to highlight the point that the definition of these two kinds of metaphor should be distinctly recognized and the consideration of one should not result in the overlooking of the other. Considering these two types as the same, undermines their value and independence and may even force the mind to choose one and ignore the other-there are cases in which this has happened or at least some writers have intended to do so. On the one hand George Lakoff’ s insistence on rejecting traditional definitions of metaphors in his essay titled “ The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor” (1993) and on the other hand the enthusiastic acclamation of Conceptual metaphor in recent years are some of the reasons for doing this study. In this article, however, neither of these two notions are denied and efforts are made to consolidate the status of both of them. So the outcomes of Conceptual metaphor in both language and literature are illustrated and it is argued that this new type of metaphor does not cause limitation to Literary metaphor, but can be an appropriate element in linguistic and literary studies.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Hassanzadeh Niri, Mohammadhassan, & Hamidfar, AliAsghar. (2020). The Literary Metaphor and the Conceptual Metaphor. JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM AND RHETORIC, 9(3 ), 1-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/392940/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Hassanzadeh Niri Mohammadhassan, Hamidfar AliAsghar. The Literary Metaphor and the Conceptual Metaphor. JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM AND RHETORIC[Internet]. 2020;9(3 ):1-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/392940/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Mohammadhassan Hassanzadeh Niri, and AliAsghar Hamidfar, “The Literary Metaphor and the Conceptual Metaphor,” JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM AND RHETORIC, vol. 9, no. 3 , pp. 1–23, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/392940/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top