A COUPLE OF SEMANTIC SUPPOSITIONS AND SOME ARGUMENTS FOR “THE PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”: A CRITICAL SURVEY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD; FURGHANI MOHAMMAD KAZEM; FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SADRĀ’I Wisdom Year:2013 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 94-104

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

545

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COUPLE OF SEMANTIC SUPPOSITIONS AND SOME ARGUMENTS FOR “THE PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”: A CRITICAL SURVEY

Author(s)

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD | FURGHANI MOHAMMAD KAZEM | FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRINCIPALITY OF BEINGQ2

IDEALITY OF QUIDDITYQ2

UNIVOCALITY OF BEINGQ2

CONSIDERATIONS OF QUIDDITYQ1

Abstract

Transcendental philosophers due to a number of reasons have defended “principality of existence”. Moreover aforementioned theory is grounded on some pre-assumptions. Hence critical encounter with this theory may be formulated in two main ways involving (i) scrutiny of pre-assumptions and (ii) checking the reasons which are presented for the theory. For a critical survey of pre-assumptions of “principality of existence”, “semantic synonymy of being” seems to be a semantic assumption which is quite wrong or at best, heavily under doubt. Also a specific understanding of words “ideationality” ('i'tibariyyat) and “quiddity” are among those concepts behind the theory which are quite vague. In order to give critical survey of arguments held for “PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”, it seems that the reason raised from “driving quiddity out from equivalence state by existence” which is assumed to be the best reason held for the theory, to be invalid. Beside these faults which one may call them “super structure” faults, there are some “infra structure” faults, among them are: the dominant duality naming “principality of existence” or “principality of quiddity” restricts the reality in existence or quiddity without mentioning any sufficient reason supporting that claim.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAAREFI, MOHAMMAD, FURGHANI, MOHAMMAD KAZEM, & FEYZBAKHSH, MOHSEN. (2013). A COUPLE OF SEMANTIC SUPPOSITIONS AND SOME ARGUMENTS FOR “THE PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”: A CRITICAL SURVEY. SADRAI WISDOM, 1(2), 94-104. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/393714/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD, FURGHANI MOHAMMAD KAZEM, FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN. A COUPLE OF SEMANTIC SUPPOSITIONS AND SOME ARGUMENTS FOR “THE PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”: A CRITICAL SURVEY. SADRAI WISDOM[Internet]. 2013;1(2):94-104. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/393714/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MAAREFI, MOHAMMAD KAZEM FURGHANI, and MOHSEN FEYZBAKHSH, “A COUPLE OF SEMANTIC SUPPOSITIONS AND SOME ARGUMENTS FOR “THE PRINCIPALITY OF BEING”: A CRITICAL SURVEY,” SADRAI WISDOM, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94–104, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/393714/en

Related Journal Papers