مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

151
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

nvestigating the criticism of Bloor's "transformative method" of Popper's "objective knowledge" theory

Pages

  211-233

Abstract

 Scientific society, like any other society, is constituted of social struc-ture. to identify that is to identify the historical evolution of science, the structure of science, etc. in this regard, another key component of Scien-tific society is the norms of science, which is the most fundamental value that governs scientific society. Norms in science are important because some believe that they describe behavior in scientific society. There are different approaches to the norm’ s role in science. The two most important theories are two theories that Karl Popper and David Bloor have put forward: 1-norms in science are social conviction. (Bloor, 1999) 2-The norms in science are abstract and Platonic. (Popper, 1972) In this article, in addition to a general description of Popper's and Bloor's theories, I will examine the criticisms that have been made by Popper's defenders on Bloor.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Montazeri Moghaddam, Hadi. (2020). nvestigating the criticism of Bloor's "transformative method" of Popper's "objective knowledge" theory. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), 9(2 (18) ), 211-233. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/393788/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Montazeri Moghaddam Hadi. nvestigating the criticism of Bloor's "transformative method" of Popper's "objective knowledge" theory. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2020;9(2 (18) ):211-233. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/393788/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Hadi Montazeri Moghaddam, “nvestigating the criticism of Bloor's "transformative method" of Popper's "objective knowledge" theory,” FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), vol. 9, no. 2 (18) , pp. 211–233, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/393788/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top