مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

707
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS PATIENTS BY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REPAIR METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Pages

  553-558

Abstract

 Background: Gross difference in return to work exists in PILONIDAL SINUS patients operated by primary and secondary repair. This survey was to evaluate the RESULTS of surgical management of PILONIDAL SINUS with primary or SECONDARY CLOSURE.Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, patients with PILONIDAL SINUS referring to the surgical clinic of Shariati Hospital in Tehran, Iran between March 2007 and March 2009 were underwent either excision with midline closure (primary, n=40), or excision without closure (secondary, n=40). The recorded outcomes were hospital stay, healing time, time off work, postoperative pain, patient’s satisfaction and the recurrence rate.Results: Majority of the patients were male (87.50%). There was no significant difference in the hospital stay. Time off work (8.65±1.73 Vs.11.53±2.33 days, p=0.001) and healing time (3.43±0.92 Vs.5.3±0.79 days, p=0.001) were shorter in primary group; but, there were no significant differences in hospital stay and number of visits.Intensity of postoperative pain in the 1st (37.75±6.5 Vs.43.63±5.06, p=0.001), 2nd (26.75±6.66 Vs.34.63±5.48, p=0.001), 3rd (18.25±6.05 Vs.27.88±6.88, p=0.001), and 7th (8.45±3.85 Vs.17.88±6.19, p=0.001) days were lower in PRIMARY CLOSURE group. There was not significant difference in complication rates in groups. Patients’ satisfaction was higher in primary group (4.15±0.53 Vs.3.6±0.5, p=0.001).Conclusion: According to this study excision and PRIMARY CLOSURE is the preferred procedure in patients with PILONIDAL SINUS. It has the advantages of shorter time off work; earlier wound healing, lesser postoperative pain, higher patients satisfaction and comparable complication and recurrence rates with excision and open wound.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HAJI BARATI, BABAK, & GHAFOURI, ALI. (2010). SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS PATIENTS BY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REPAIR METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 68(9), 553-558. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/39558/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HAJI BARATI BABAK, GHAFOURI ALI. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS PATIENTS BY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REPAIR METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2010;68(9):553-558. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/39558/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BABAK HAJI BARATI, and ALI GHAFOURI, “SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS PATIENTS BY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REPAIR METHODS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 553–558, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/39558/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button