The Comparison of Study Approaches, Achievement Goals and Personality Traits between Who Were Accepted and not Accepted in Master Test

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BARGHI ISA; SAYADI SADEGH; AMIRI MOSLEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES Year:2019 | Volume:9 | Issue:27 Page(s): 7-40

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

424

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Comparison of Study Approaches, Achievement Goals and Personality Traits between Who Were Accepted and not Accepted in Master Test

Author(s)

BARGHI ISA | SAYADI SADEGH | AMIRI MOSLEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Study approachesQ1

achievement GoalsQ1

personality traitsQ2

Master testQ1

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare approaches, achievement Goals and personality traits between accepted and not accepted students in Master test. The sample consisted of 260 Razi University students that included 130 accepted and 130 not accepted students in Master test. Revised Study Process Questionnaire (Biggs, Kember, & Leung, 2001), achievement Goals questionnaire (Elliot & McGregor, 2001) and Big Five Inventory (John, Donahue & Kentle, 1991). Data analysis methods were multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis. The results showed there are significant differences between Study approaches, achievementgoals and personality traits of accepted and not accepted students. As well as discriminant analysis showed that according to these three variables, the accepted and not accepted students of Master test can be predicted with a confidence coefficient of 77. 37. According to present study results, it can be stated that students who do not use surface study approach and do not have mastery-avoidance, performance-avoidance and performance-approach achievement Goals, and have high conscientiousness and openness to experience and low neuroticism are more likely to succeed in Master test.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BARGHI, ISA, SAYADI, SADEGH, & AMIRI, MOSLEM. (2019). The Comparison of Study Approaches, Achievement Goals and Personality Traits between Who Were Accepted and not Accepted in Master Test. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES, 9(27 ), 7-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/397287/en

Vancouver: Copy

BARGHI ISA, SAYADI SADEGH, AMIRI MOSLEM. The Comparison of Study Approaches, Achievement Goals and Personality Traits between Who Were Accepted and not Accepted in Master Test. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES[Internet]. 2019;9(27 ):7-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/397287/en

IEEE: Copy

ISA BARGHI, SADEGH SAYADI, and MOSLEM AMIRI, “The Comparison of Study Approaches, Achievement Goals and Personality Traits between Who Were Accepted and not Accepted in Master Test,” JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION STUDIES, vol. 9, no. 27 , pp. 7–40, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/397287/en

Related Journal Papers