A systematic review and analysis of the co-opetition theories and approaches as a paradox in the strategic management literature

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOLTANI MORTEZA; Shahbazi Meisam; AHMADIAN ALIASHRAF; HAMIDIZADEH ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES Year:2019 | Volume:14 | Issue:53 Page(s): 135-173

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

320

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A systematic review and analysis of the co-opetition theories and approaches as a paradox in the strategic management literature

Author(s)

SOLTANI MORTEZA | Shahbazi Meisam | AHMADIAN ALIASHRAF | HAMIDIZADEH ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Co-opetitionQ1

Co-opetition theoryQ1

Mutual trustQ2

Psycho-organizational approachQ1

Abstract

With wider environmental constraints, more complex competition, market fragmentation and changing customers preferences, business firms are looking for new approaches to overcome these challenges. One of the strategies dealing with these challenges is called Co-opetition, which is a paradox in area of strategic management literature. The purpose of this paper is a systematic review of literature on coopetition theories and approaches. We first introduce the most significant theories found in the area of strategic management. Then, by systematically reviewing the literature we look for typologies in order to formulate the research general framework. The findings of the research show that ten basic theories of coopetition form the general theoretical framework of the study. But, among them, the most pervasive theories are game theory, resource based theory and network theory. Furthermore, the results indicate that there are different views among theorists on how to interpret coopetition strategy in terms of its advantages, applications, typologies, paradoxical nature as well as how it affects the performance of business enterprises. Also, two issues of Mutual trust and tension management can be used to better understand this strategy.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SOLTANI, MORTEZA, Shahbazi, Meisam, AHMADIAN, ALIASHRAF, & HAMIDIZADEH, ALI. (2019). A systematic review and analysis of the co-opetition theories and approaches as a paradox in the strategic management literature. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 14(53 ), 135-173. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/397588/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOLTANI MORTEZA, Shahbazi Meisam, AHMADIAN ALIASHRAF, HAMIDIZADEH ALI. A systematic review and analysis of the co-opetition theories and approaches as a paradox in the strategic management literature. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES[Internet]. 2019;14(53 ):135-173. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/397588/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA SOLTANI, Meisam Shahbazi, ALIASHRAF AHMADIAN, and ALI HAMIDIZADEH, “A systematic review and analysis of the co-opetition theories and approaches as a paradox in the strategic management literature,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, vol. 14, no. 53 , pp. 135–173, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/397588/en

Related Journal Papers