Eternity and Incipience of the Soul according to Ibn Kammuna and Ibn Sina, and a Critique of Ibn Kammuna’ s Account

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Nuri Sifat Marziyih (Nura); Maliki (Jalaluddin Muhammad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENOMINATIONS Year:2020 | Volume:6 | Issue:12 Page(s): 314-333

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

319

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Eternity and Incipience of the Soul according to Ibn Kammuna and Ibn Sina, and a Critique of Ibn Kammuna’ s Account

Author(s)

Nuri Sifat Marziyih (Nura) | Maliki (Jalaluddin Muhammad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Ibn Sīnā

Ibn Kammūna

soul’s eternity

soul’s incipience

critique of Ibn Kammūna’s theory

Abstract

The problem of soul (or its equivalents in other languages, such as “nafs” in Arabic and “jān” in Persian) is an important issue considered by people since very old times. Philosophers and intellectuals have tried to account for it in their ontologies, and have offered different theories. For Muslim intellectuals, the problem of soul has had a special place, and a variety of remarkable theories were proposed by prominent Muslim philosophers with an eye to Quranic doctrines. This paper considers two great philosophers of the Islamic world—Ibn Sīnā (or Avicenna) and Ibn Kammūna—in order to deal with an issue concerning the soul: its “eternity or incipience.” These two philosophers had different views of the matter. In this paper, we challenge these two views: Peripatetic and Illuminationist Peripatetic. We finally criticize Ibn Kammūna’s theory of the soul’s incipience and survival.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Nuri Sifat, Marziyih (Nura), & Maliki (Jalaluddin, Muhammad. (2020). Eternity and Incipience of the Soul according to Ibn Kammuna and Ibn Sina, and a Critique of Ibn Kammuna’ s Account. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENOMINATIONS, 6(12 ), 314-333. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/402391/en

Vancouver: Copy

Nuri Sifat Marziyih (Nura), Maliki (Jalaluddin Muhammad. Eternity and Incipience of the Soul according to Ibn Kammuna and Ibn Sina, and a Critique of Ibn Kammuna’ s Account. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENOMINATIONS[Internet]. 2020;6(12 ):314-333. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/402391/en

IEEE: Copy

Marziyih (Nura) Nuri Sifat, and Muhammad Maliki (Jalaluddin, “Eternity and Incipience of the Soul according to Ibn Kammuna and Ibn Sina, and a Critique of Ibn Kammuna’ s Account,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENOMINATIONS, vol. 6, no. 12 , pp. 314–333, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/402391/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops