Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sheikhzadeh Jooshani Sedigheh; KAMALI YAHYA; Kamyabi Kiana

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Woman in Development and Politics Year:2021 | Volume:19 | Issue:1 Page(s): 65-94

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

387

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran

Author(s)

Sheikhzadeh Jooshani Sedigheh | KAMALI YAHYA | Kamyabi Kiana | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

argumentQ3

Speech Act of ArgumentationQ2

Argumentative StructureQ2

Toulmin Model of ArgumentationQ1

Women's RepresentationQ1

presidential electionsQ1

IranQ1

Abstract

Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran Abstract The issue of women's right to represent in the Iranian presidential election has been a part of political discourses and scientific researches in the field of women political participation in recent years. So far as it has become a debatable claim. This paper focuses on the statements of 26 people, including "legislators, election observers, jurists, women with management and political representation backgrounds, and female candidates in the presidential election in the period of 1980 – 2019 and, given their claims are as argumentative acts. By using Toulmin's Argument Model, the paper has attempted to show how the proponents and opponents of Women's Representation right in the presidential election in Iran have shaped their Argumentative Structure. Findings from the qualitative content analysis of 50 argumentative texts indicate that all of the arguers have used structures the main components in their argumentative, including: claim, data and warrant from the Toulminian Model. But only in the two texts has been used the six components of Toulminian Model. So, they are not perfect arguments. The researchers conclude that the presence of field-dependent warrants in the Argumentative Structure of the proponents implies that they are trying to challenge the claims of the opponents’ claims and, thereby they increase the legitimacy of their arguments. Keywords: Argument, Speech Act of Argumentation, Argumentative Structure, Toulmin Model of Argumentation, Women's Representation, presidential elections, Iran.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Sheikhzadeh Jooshani, Sedigheh, KAMALI, YAHYA, & Kamyabi, Kiana. (2021). Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran. WOMAN IN DEVELOPMENT AND POLITICS (WOMEN'S RESEARCH), 19(1 ), 65-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/402996/en

Vancouver: Copy

Sheikhzadeh Jooshani Sedigheh, KAMALI YAHYA, Kamyabi Kiana. Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran. WOMAN IN DEVELOPMENT AND POLITICS (WOMEN'S RESEARCH)[Internet]. 2021;19(1 ):65-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/402996/en

IEEE: Copy

Sedigheh Sheikhzadeh Jooshani, YAHYA KAMALI, and Kiana Kamyabi, “Qualitative Aanalysis of the Argumentative Structure of Proponents and Opponents of Women's Representation Right in the Presidential Election in Iran,” WOMAN IN DEVELOPMENT AND POLITICS (WOMEN'S RESEARCH), vol. 19, no. 1 , pp. 65–94, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/402996/en

Related Journal Papers