EARLY OUTCOME OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER VERSUS PERIPHERAL IV LINE IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI M.B.; JODEIRI B.; MAHALLEI M.; ABDOLI OSKOOI SH.; SAFARI A.; SALIMI Z.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Feyz Medical Sciences Journal Year:2014 | Volume:7 | Issue:6 Page(s): 561-567

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,063

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EARLY OUTCOME OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER VERSUS PERIPHERAL IV LINE IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES

Author(s)

Keywords

NEONATESQ3

PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERQ2

PERIPHERAL IV LINEQ2

Abstract

Background: Long-term hospitalization of preterm NEONATES and maintaining a secure intravenous line for them to provide nutrition and drugs are serious problems among some specialists. The purpose of this study was to compare the two types of IV access: PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER (PICC) and conventional PERIPHERAL IV LINE.Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 117 preterm NEONATES with birth weight less than 1500 g were divided into the PICC line (57 cases) and PERIPHERAL IV LINE (60 cases) groups. The early outcomes including the duration of catheterization, catheter-related infection, and mortality rate of the NEONATES were compared for both groups.Results: The mean birth weights in the PICC and peripheral IV groups were 1061±183 g and 1054±217 g, respectively (P=0.7). Sepsis with positive blood culture was reported in 8 cases in the PICC group and 7 cases in the peripheral IV group (P=0.9). Moreover, 7cases with a positive catheter tip culture (colonization) were found in the PICC group. Mortality rates in the PICC and PERIPHERAL IV LINE groups were 6 and 5, respectively (P=0.9).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, PICC does not increase the risk of sepsis and mortality rate in the NEONATES. Considering many advantages of the PICC line including its durability, it can be recommended for very low birth weight NEONATES.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, M.B., JODEIRI, B., MAHALLEI, M., ABDOLI OSKOOI, SH., SAFARI, A., & SALIMI, Z.. (2014). EARLY OUTCOME OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER VERSUS PERIPHERAL IV LINE IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES. FEYZ, 7(6), 561-567. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/40466/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI M.B., JODEIRI B., MAHALLEI M., ABDOLI OSKOOI SH., SAFARI A., SALIMI Z.. EARLY OUTCOME OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER VERSUS PERIPHERAL IV LINE IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES. FEYZ[Internet]. 2014;7(6):561-567. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/40466/en

IEEE: Copy

M.B. HOSSEINI, B. JODEIRI, M. MAHALLEI, SH. ABDOLI OSKOOI, A. SAFARI, and Z. SALIMI, “EARLY OUTCOME OF PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER VERSUS PERIPHERAL IV LINE IN VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NEONATES,” FEYZ, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 561–567, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/40466/en

Related Journal Papers