مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,036
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE SCREENING INSTRUMENTS FOR MENTAL DISORDER AMONG STUDENTS OF KASHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DURING 2011-2012

Pages

  575-581

Keywords

GHQQ3
BSIQ2

Abstract

 Background: One of the most important topics in clinical psychology is finding and measuring of independent tools that have the same results for the evaluation of a psychological characteristic. There are only few studies that have examined the agreement between these methods. This study aimed to compare the three screening instruments for mental disorder among STUDENTS of Kashan University of Medical Sciences during 2011-2012.Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 983 STUDENTS of Kashan University of Medical Sciences were selected using simple random sampling during 2011-2012. STUDENTS were asked to complete three MENTAL HEALTH questionnaires including GHQ-28, BSI and MMPI. Data were analyzed using SPSS software.Results: Findings showed that the prevalence rates for mental disorder based on the GHQ-28, BSI and MMPI questionnaires were 39.1%, 44.8%, and 44%, respectively. Correlation coefficients for GHQ-28 with BSI, GHQ-28 with MMPI and BSI with MMPI were 0.588, 0.488, and 0.533, respectively. The corrected classification of GHQ28 with BSI was 73.3%, GHQ28 with MMPI 71.5% and BSI with MMPI 69.8%. Kappa coefficient showed high level of agreement between the three tests.Conclusion: According to the results of the study, there is a relatively high correlation between the three instruments in diagnosis of mental disorder among the STUDENTS.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AKBARI, H., ZERAATI, H., MOHAMMAD, K., MAHMOODI FARAHANI, M., & OMIDI, A.. (2014). EVALUATING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE SCREENING INSTRUMENTS FOR MENTAL DISORDER AMONG STUDENTS OF KASHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DURING 2011-2012. FEYZ, 7(6), 575-581. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/40468/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AKBARI H., ZERAATI H., MOHAMMAD K., MAHMOODI FARAHANI M., OMIDI A.. EVALUATING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE SCREENING INSTRUMENTS FOR MENTAL DISORDER AMONG STUDENTS OF KASHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DURING 2011-2012. FEYZ[Internet]. 2014;7(6):575-581. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/40468/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. AKBARI, H. ZERAATI, K. MOHAMMAD, M. MAHMOODI FARAHANI, and A. OMIDI, “EVALUATING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE SCREENING INSTRUMENTS FOR MENTAL DISORDER AMONG STUDENTS OF KASHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES DURING 2011-2012,” FEYZ, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 575–581, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/40468/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button