A CRITIQUE TO THE OPPONENTS’ ETHICAL REASONS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ATRAK H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ethics in Science and Technology Year:2012 | Volume:7 | Issue:3 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,058

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITIQUE TO THE OPPONENTS’ ETHICAL REASONS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING

Author(s)

ATRAK H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ETHICSQ2

HUMAN CLONINGQ3

HUMAN DIGNITYQ1

HUMAN AUTONOMYQ2

HUMAN AS ENDQ2

Abstract

Background: HUMAN CLONING is one of the most controversial issues in Medical ETHICS, having both advocates and opponents. This paper examines and critiques the opponents’ reasons against HUMAN CLONING.Methods: The methods of this paper is analytic. First, the most important reasons given by the opponents of HUMAN CLONING are presented and then they are analyzed and critiqued. Some of these reasons are as follows: the violation of HUMAN DIGNITY and the principle of HUMAN AUTONOMY, the violation of the principle of authority and the Principle of Informed Consent, as well as the risk of eugenics, its being unnatural, and its being interference in the work of God.Conclusion: The writer believes that the opponents’ Ethical arguments on the prohibition of HUMAN CLONING are not convincing -as they do not prove the essential immorality of this new technology. Therefore, given the potential benefits of this technology, research may be permitted to be carried out on it. Controlled HUMAN CLONING on a limited scale is acceptable from ethical point of view.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ATRAK, H.. (2012). A CRITIQUE TO THE OPPONENTS’ ETHICAL REASONS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 7(3), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/409070/en

Vancouver: Copy

ATRAK H.. A CRITIQUE TO THE OPPONENTS’ ETHICAL REASONS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2012;7(3):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/409070/en

IEEE: Copy

H. ATRAK, “A CRITIQUE TO THE OPPONENTS’ ETHICAL REASONS AGAINST HUMAN CLONING,” ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 0–0, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/409070/en

Related Journal Papers