مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

279
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Analysis of Al-Ghazali's Philosophers and Study of Ibn Rushd's Defense

Pages

  185-209

Abstract

 Philosophical understanding of the concept of God, and theological understanding of the concept of God from the beginning has faced challenges and conflicts that may be the culmination of this conflict in the Tahafat of Ghazali Philosophers who excommunicated philosophers for believing in three issues. The purpose of this research is to re-read Ghazali's critiques of philosophers and to test his point of view, then to examine the strengths and weaknesses of Ibn Rushd's defense. Al-Ghazali has rightly realized that proving the existence of God is a difficult path by proving the step of the universe, however, believing in the temporal existence of the universe also has false consequences that are no less than the consequences of the teachings of philosophers. Regarding the knowledge of God in detail, Ibn Rushd's answer seems appropriate and can solve Ghazali's objection in this regard. Al-Ghazali differs from Ibn Rushd in that he cites the Qur'an to prove the knowledge of God in all its details, but the philosopher comments on something about which he cannot have a correct and accurate understanding. Regarding the physical resurrection, Ibn Rushd harmonizes the interpretation between philosophical truth and religious teaching, but with the disagreement of Ibn Rushd and Ghazali about the interpretation in the final judgment.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHASEMI, AZAM. (2022). Analysis of Al-Ghazali's Philosophers and Study of Ibn Rushd's Defense. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2(4 ), 185-209. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/409825/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHASEMI AZAM. Analysis of Al-Ghazali's Philosophers and Study of Ibn Rushd's Defense. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2022;2(4 ):185-209. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/409825/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AZAM GHASEMI, “Analysis of Al-Ghazali's Philosophers and Study of Ibn Rushd's Defense,” METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 2, no. 4 , pp. 185–209, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/409825/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top