DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY VERSUS PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR KERATOCONUS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVADI M.A.; FEYZI SEPEHR; JAMSHIDI FARSANI M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2009 | Volume:15 | Issue:1 (58) Page(s): 41-50

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,394

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY VERSUS PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR KERATOCONUS

Author(s)

JAVADI M.A. | FEYZI SEPEHR | JAMSHIDI FARSANI M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KERATOPLASTYQ3

KERATOCONUSQ3

CLINICAL TRIALQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar KERATOPLASTY (DALK) using the big-bubble technique with that of penetrating KERATOPLASTY (PK) in patients with KERATOCONUS.Methods: This double-blind CLINICAL TRIAL included patients with moderate to advanced KERATOCONUS and poor spectacle-corrected visual acuity or contact lens intolerance. Refractive errors, best corrected visual acuity (BCYA), contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) were compared between the study groups.Results: Forty-two eyes underwent DALK while 35 eyes received PK. Mean patient age was 26.91±7.9 versus 30.89±10.3 years in the DALK and PK groups, respectively (P=0.06). Mean follow-up period was 19.0±7.9 months in the DALK and 24.6±3.5 months in the PK group (P=0.32). Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refractive error was -3.23±3.4 D in the DALK group versus -2.22±4.6 D in the PK group (P=0.28) and mean postoperative BCYA was O.18±0.08 logMAR and O.15±0.10 logMAR, respectively (P=0.12). There was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of CSF, total aberrations and HOAs. Conclusions: DALK may be considered as an effective alternative to PK in patients with KERATOCONUS.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVADI, M.A., FEYZI, SEPEHR, & JAMSHIDI FARSANI, M.R.. (2009). DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY VERSUS PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR KERATOCONUS. BINA, 15(1 (58)), 41-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42242/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVADI M.A., FEYZI SEPEHR, JAMSHIDI FARSANI M.R.. DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY VERSUS PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR KERATOCONUS. BINA[Internet]. 2009;15(1 (58)):41-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42242/en

IEEE: Copy

M.A. JAVADI, SEPEHR FEYZI, and M.R. JAMSHIDI FARSANI, “DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY VERSUS PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY FOR KERATOCONUS,” BINA, vol. 15, no. 1 (58), pp. 41–50, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42242/en

Related Journal Papers