CORNEAL PACHYMETRY USING ULTRASOUND VS ORBSCAN II IN NORMAL AND POST - LASIK EYES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOVAHEDAN H.; KHOUSHGHADAM J.; KATBAB ASAD ELAH; KHOUSHNIAT H.; JAHADI H.R.; SALOUTI S.; NEJABAT M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2005 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 (42) Page(s): 75-80

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,236

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CORNEAL PACHYMETRY USING ULTRASOUND VS ORBSCAN II IN NORMAL AND POST - LASIK EYES

Author(s)

Keywords

PACHYMETRYQ3

ULTRASOUNDQ3

ORBSCAN IIQ3

NORMAL EYEQ3

POST-LASIKQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare ORBSCAN II (O II) and ULTRASOUND (US) PACHYMETRY in normal and POST-LASIK eyes.Methods: In a comparative prospective study, central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured in 168 eyes of 84 normal subjects and 42 eyes without corneal opacity of 21 POST-LASIK patients by O II and US. Paired t test was used to identify significant differences between the two methods and Pearson test was used to identify the correlation of measurements between the two methods.Results: Mean CCT measured by ULTRASOUND (538.7±47.4mm) was less than that of O II (542.7±52.2 mm) in the NORMAL EYEs (P<0.04), but mean CCT measured by ULTRASOUND (477.8±38.2mm) was greater than that of O II (469.5±47.2mm) in the POST-LASIK eyes. (p<0.02) There was significant linear correlation between US and O II in both groups. (r=0.87, P=0.000 and r=0.88, P=0.000, respectively).Conclusion: Mean difference of CCT measurements between O II and US in normal and post- LASIK clear cornea is not clinically significant and interchangeable use of data in planning or assessing corneal surgery is possible.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOVAHEDAN, H., KHOUSHGHADAM, J., KATBAB, ASAD ELAH, KHOUSHNIAT, H., JAHADI, H.R., SALOUTI, S., & NEJABAT, M.. (2005). CORNEAL PACHYMETRY USING ULTRASOUND VS ORBSCAN II IN NORMAL AND POST - LASIK EYES. BINA, 11(1 (42)), 75-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42316/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOVAHEDAN H., KHOUSHGHADAM J., KATBAB ASAD ELAH, KHOUSHNIAT H., JAHADI H.R., SALOUTI S., NEJABAT M.. CORNEAL PACHYMETRY USING ULTRASOUND VS ORBSCAN II IN NORMAL AND POST - LASIK EYES. BINA[Internet]. 2005;11(1 (42)):75-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42316/en

IEEE: Copy

H. MOVAHEDAN, J. KHOUSHGHADAM, ASAD ELAH KATBAB, H. KHOUSHNIAT, H.R. JAHADI, S. SALOUTI, and M. NEJABAT, “CORNEAL PACHYMETRY USING ULTRASOUND VS ORBSCAN II IN NORMAL AND POST - LASIK EYES,” BINA, vol. 11, no. 1 (42), pp. 75–80, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42316/en

Related Journal Papers