VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY: DESCEMITIC VERSUS PRE-DESCEMETIC DISSECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVADI M.A.; FEYZI S.; MOLAEI FARIDEH; KARIMI SAEID; DOUZANDEH A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2010 | Volume:16 | Issue:1 (62) Page(s): 19-25

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

709

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY: DESCEMITIC VERSUS PRE-DESCEMETIC DISSECTION

Author(s)

Keywords

KERATOCONUSQ3

DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTYQ3

BIG-BUBBLE TECHNIQUEQ3

BARED DESCEMET'S MEMBRANEQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of posterior residual stroma on visual function after unsuccessful Anwar's DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY (DALK).Methoods: In this parallel historical cohort, visual acuity and refractive status were evaluated after Descemetic DALK (group 1) and compared with those of pre-Descemetic DALK (group 2).Results: One hundred and ten keratoconic eyes were enrolled. A bare Descemet’s membrane (DM) was successfully achieved in 93 (84.5%) eyes in group (1) and 17 (15.4%) eyes in group (2). Mean follow-up period was 20±8 and 20±7 months in groups (1) and (2), respectively (P= 0.08). Postoperative best spectaclecorrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was significantly better in group (1) than in group (2) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. However, there was no significant difference between study groups at final examination. The two groups were comparable in terms of keratometric astigmatism and spherical equivalent refractive error throughout the follow-up period.Conclusion: Retention of posterior corneal stroma delays visual recovery after DALK using Anwar's technique; however, both descemetic and pre-descemetic methods have acceptable and comparable visual acuity levels at final follow-up.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVADI, M.A., FEYZI, S., MOLAEI, FARIDEH, KARIMI, SAEID, & DOUZANDEH, A.. (2010). VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY: DESCEMITIC VERSUS PRE-DESCEMETIC DISSECTION. BINA, 16(1 (62)), 19-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42593/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVADI M.A., FEYZI S., MOLAEI FARIDEH, KARIMI SAEID, DOUZANDEH A.. VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY: DESCEMITIC VERSUS PRE-DESCEMETIC DISSECTION. BINA[Internet]. 2010;16(1 (62)):19-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42593/en

IEEE: Copy

M.A. JAVADI, S. FEYZI, FARIDEH MOLAEI, SAEID KARIMI, and A. DOUZANDEH, “VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY: DESCEMITIC VERSUS PRE-DESCEMETIC DISSECTION,” BINA, vol. 16, no. 1 (62), pp. 19–25, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42593/en

Related Journal Papers