Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in Normal Individuals

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAHRAMI M.; AZIMI A.; SEDAGHAT M.R.; MOMENI H.; TABESH H.; YEKTA A.A.; BAHRAMI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2019 | Volume:24 | Issue:2 Page(s): 94-98

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

505

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in Normal Individuals

Author(s)

Keywords

Central Corneal ThicknessQ1

OCTQ3

Orbscan II PentacamQ1

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the Central Corneal Thickness measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in normal individuals. Methods: In this cross sectional comparative study, the researcher investigated the eyes of 70 normal candidates (140 eyes) with the mean age of 31. 42 ± 7. 70, referring to Dr. Sedaghat eye clinic for refractive surgery. For each person, Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) was measured, using 3 devices including Pentacam, OCTCasia2 and Orbscan. The data were collected and analyzed. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient was employed to assess correlation of 3 devices with each other. Bland-Altman plot was also used to evaluate the agreement between devices. Results: The mean CCT measured through Orbscan, Pentacam, and OCTCasia2 was reported to be 535. 06± 35. 11 μ m, 525. 21± 31. 60 μ m, and 511. 06± 30. 87 μ m, respectively. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between Pentacam-OCTCasia2, OCTCasia2-Orbscan, Pentacam-Orbscan were r=0. 955; P<0. 001, r=0. 913; P<0. 001, r=0. 941; P<0. 001, respectively. Conclusion: There was a very good correlation and agreement between devices, but none of the devices had the ability to replace each other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAHRAMI, M., AZIMI, A., SEDAGHAT, M.R., MOMENI, H., TABESH, H., YEKTA, A.A., & BAHRAMI, M.. (2019). Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in Normal Individuals. BINA, 24(2 ), 94-98. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42912/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAHRAMI M., AZIMI A., SEDAGHAT M.R., MOMENI H., TABESH H., YEKTA A.A., BAHRAMI M.. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in Normal Individuals. BINA[Internet]. 2019;24(2 ):94-98. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42912/en

IEEE: Copy

M. BAHRAMI, A. AZIMI, M.R. SEDAGHAT, H. MOMENI, H. TABESH, A.A. YEKTA, and M. BAHRAMI, “Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured through Pentacam, OCTCasia2, and Orbscan IIz in Normal Individuals,” BINA, vol. 24, no. 2 , pp. 94–98, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42912/en

Related Journal Papers