COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTS AND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL BIOPSIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHIVA ATENA; SOBOUTI FARHAD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2017 | Volume:26 | Issue:144 Page(s): 57-64

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

678

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTS AND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL BIOPSIES

Author(s)

SHIVA ATENA | SOBOUTI FARHAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLINICAL DIAGNOSISQ2

HISTHOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGQ3

BIOPSYQ2

Abstract

Background and purpose: The most effective way to achieve a correct diagnosis of oral lesions is appropriate BIOPSY and pathological examination. This study evaluated the concordance between clinical and histopathological diagnoses in patients with oral lesions.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was performed in 206 patients who had biopsies in a center for oral and maxillofacial pathology in Sari, Iran during 2011-2015. Demographic characteristics including age and gender were recorded. Also, consistency and color of the lesion, the biological process, anatomical location, exophytic or flat lesion, surface shape, peripheral or central, specialty of physicians and CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS, and consistency with the histopathologic diagnosis were studied and analyzed by Chi-square and Fisher, Kappa test.Results: CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS was consistent with histopathologic diagnosis in 77.1% of the cases. Correct CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS in malignant lesions (75%) was more than that in benign lesions (72.7%). Compared with peripheral lesions, the diagnosis of central lesions was more in agreement with histopathologic diagnosis (81.1%), amongst which radicular cysts were diagnosed correctly in most of the cases (coefficient agreement: 92%). The most correct CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS was in the smooth lesions (68.3%) and gum lesions (68.5%). The highest coefficient agreement with pathology results was observed in maxillofacial surgeons (86.5%).Conclusion: A high rate of CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS and pathology reports corroborated each other, nevertheless, significant rate of mismatch still exist which should decrease by suitable approaches.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHIVA, ATENA, & SOBOUTI, FARHAD. (2017). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTS AND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL BIOPSIES. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 26(144), 57-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/45381/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHIVA ATENA, SOBOUTI FARHAD. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTS AND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL BIOPSIES. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2017;26(144):57-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/45381/en

IEEE: Copy

ATENA SHIVA, and FARHAD SOBOUTI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTOPATHOLOGICAL REPORTS AND CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF ORAL BIOPSIES,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 26, no. 144, pp. 57–64, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/45381/en

Related Journal Papers