THE VIEW OF DELIVERY BY PRACTITIONERS IN ROUTINE EPISIOTOMY: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHANI SOGHRA; AHMAD SHIRVANI M.; BAGHERI NASAMI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2009 | Volume:18 | Issue:68 Page(s): 27-39

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

997

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE VIEW OF DELIVERY BY PRACTITIONERS IN ROUTINE EPISIOTOMY: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Author(s)

KHANI SOGHRA | AHMAD SHIRVANI M. | BAGHERI NASAMI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EPISIOTOMYQ3

QUALITATIVE STUDYQ2

VIEWQ2

MIDWIFEQ2

OBSTETRICIANSQ2

Abstract

Background and purpose: Many studies have determined desirable outcomes of elective EPISIOTOMY. However, the clinical practice is not based on results in many hospitals. For this reason, the present study assessed the VIEW of practitioners regarding routine EPISIOTOMY.Materials and methods: This QUALITATIVE STUDY was done by content analysis. A through semi-structured interview was done with OBSTETRICIANS, midwives and MIDWIFEry trainers. After gathering information, common points of interviews were coded and stratified. Continuous comparison was done to obtain confidence of internal constancy in coding. For validity and reliability, three members of group coded the interviews independently, followed by defining the final theme. Themes were then returned to participants for confidence of their accuracy.Results: Twenty-four participants were assessed. Factors that influence the usage of routine EPISIOTOMY included 5 total concepts. Also, some partial concepts appeared as subcategory of total concepts. They were: 1. delivery agent (personal experience, skill, deficit of agents, fatigue and impatience, low knowledge, ability of communication with mother, and agent's role); 2. Mother (prevention and decline of injuries, anatomical differences, culture, not cooperating and, diseases); 3. Fetus (prevention and decline of trauma, conditions); 4. Legal problems (mother's complaints, remonstrance by seniors). 5. Method of management (non availibity of advanced technology, non usage of new methods for delivery, Mothers not being prepared).Conclusion: In a prolonged clinical practice, such as routine EPISIOTOMY, change is difficult. As studies recommend the limited use of EPISIOTOMY, intervention is necessary for changing practitioners' attitude and practice. Training of delivery agents, students and pregnant women are basic.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHANI, SOGHRA, AHMAD SHIRVANI, M., & BAGHERI NASAMI, M.. (2009). THE VIEW OF DELIVERY BY PRACTITIONERS IN ROUTINE EPISIOTOMY: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 18(68), 27-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/45722/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHANI SOGHRA, AHMAD SHIRVANI M., BAGHERI NASAMI M.. THE VIEW OF DELIVERY BY PRACTITIONERS IN ROUTINE EPISIOTOMY: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2009;18(68):27-39. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/45722/en

IEEE: Copy

SOGHRA KHANI, M. AHMAD SHIRVANI, and M. BAGHERI NASAMI, “THE VIEW OF DELIVERY BY PRACTITIONERS IN ROUTINE EPISIOTOMY: A QUALITATIVE STUDY,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 18, no. 68, pp. 27–39, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/45722/en

Related Journal Papers