TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAGHI Z.A.; GHAEMI M.; BAGHERI R.; JANGJOU A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,034

Download:

162

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY

Author(s)

HAGHI Z.A. | GHAEMI M. | BAGHERI R. | JANGJOU A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ESOPHAGEAL CANCERQ2

ESOPHAGECTOMYQ2

TRANSHIATALQ2

TRANSTHORACICQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Due to our geographical area of living, ESOPHAGEAL CANCER is one of the most common cancers in gastrointestinal system. Treatment of choice in these diseases is surgery. Because of various kinds of surgical techniques, in this study we tried to compare common techniques in these groups of patients.Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study between 1990 and 2005 all patients with ESOPHAGEAL CANCER in middle and distal third of esophagus whom underwent TRANSHIATAL or TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY, have been studied about age, sex, pathology of tumor and tumor staging.Then in other study, with considering special parameters of two groups (transhiatal or TRANSTHORACIC) are studied separately about factors such as intraoperative bleeding, operation time, post-operation morbidity, time of hospitalization, mortality 30 days after surgery, incidence of anastomosis leak and stenosis and survival have been evaluated.Results: 156 patients entered our study with M/F=110/46 ratio. 116 patients with S.C.C and 40 patients with adenocarcinoma The comparing study between TRANSHIATAL groups with Ivor Lewis groups (with similarization) showed intraoperate bleeding, cardiac and pulmonary complications after surgery, mean time of hospitalization, mortality in 30 days after surgery and incidence of late stenosis and survival are similar but the incidence of anastomosis leakage was higher in TRANSHIATAL group and mean operation time was longer in Ivor Lewis group. Since the leakage was more common in TRANSHIATAL group but mortality rates were the same, it indicates that leaking in neck has a better outcome.Conclusions: According to the results of this study, both of these techniques are similar and choosing one of them depends on surgeon’s choice and patient’s conditions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAGHI, Z.A., GHAEMI, M., BAGHERI, R., & JANGJOU, A.. (2006). TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 18(2 (44)), 11-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49545/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAGHI Z.A., GHAEMI M., BAGHERI R., JANGJOU A.. TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY[Internet]. 2006;18(2 (44)):11-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49545/en

IEEE: Copy

Z.A. HAGHI, M. GHAEMI, R. BAGHERI, and A. JANGJOU, “TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, vol. 18, no. 2 (44), pp. 11–17, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49545/en

Related Journal Papers