COMPARATIVE STUDY ON COST AND EFFECTS OF NON INVASIVE HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAZEMI SHADI; DAGHAGHZADEH HAMED; KAZEMI YALDA; HABIBZADEH MOHAMMADREZA; MOINZADEH FIROOZEH; DAVARI MAJID; TAVAKKOLI HAMID; EMAMI MOHAMMAD HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S) Year:2011 | Volume:29 | Issue:154 Page(s): 1200-1207

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

686

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON COST AND EFFECTS OF NON INVASIVE HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

Author(s)

Keywords

HELICOBACTER PYLORIQ3

STOOL ANTIGEN TESTQ2

UREA BREATH TESTQ2

Abstract

Background: HELICOBACTER PYLORI is the most common microorganism which colonizes in gastrointestinal system. There are different methods for diagnosis of infection such as rapid stool antigen, urea breath and serology tests. The purpose of this study was comparing the cost and effectiveness of these methods.Methods: 94 dyspeptic patients with mean age of 46 ± 14 years, were evaluated. The patients were considered infected when the results of 2 tests (rapid STOOL ANTIGEN TEST, UREA BREATH TEST, rapid urease test and histology) was positive.Findings: Accuracy of rapid STOOL ANTIGEN TEST was 91%, UREA BREATH TEST was 82% and serology was 52%.Conclusion: As the cost of STOOL ANTIGEN TEST was minimum, it is concluded that rapid STOOL ANTIGEN TEST is more cost-benefit, accurate and reliable test for diagnosis of HELICOBACTER PYLORI compared with UREA BREATH TEST and serology.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KAZEMI, SHADI, DAGHAGHZADEH, HAMED, KAZEMI, YALDA, HABIBZADEH, MOHAMMADREZA, MOINZADEH, FIROOZEH, DAVARI, MAJID, TAVAKKOLI, HAMID, & EMAMI, MOHAMMAD HASSAN. (2011). COMPARATIVE STUDY ON COST AND EFFECTS OF NON INVASIVE HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSTIC TESTS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 29(154), 1200-1207. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49999/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAZEMI SHADI, DAGHAGHZADEH HAMED, KAZEMI YALDA, HABIBZADEH MOHAMMADREZA, MOINZADEH FIROOZEH, DAVARI MAJID, TAVAKKOLI HAMID, EMAMI MOHAMMAD HASSAN. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON COST AND EFFECTS OF NON INVASIVE HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSTIC TESTS. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2011;29(154):1200-1207. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49999/en

IEEE: Copy

SHADI KAZEMI, HAMED DAGHAGHZADEH, YALDA KAZEMI, MOHAMMADREZA HABIBZADEH, FIROOZEH MOINZADEH, MAJID DAVARI, HAMID TAVAKKOLI, and MOHAMMAD HASSAN EMAMI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY ON COST AND EFFECTS OF NON INVASIVE HELICOBACTER PYLORI DIAGNOSTIC TESTS,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 29, no. 154, pp. 1200–1207, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49999/en

Related Journal Papers