COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THESIS STRUCTURE IN TWO POINT TIME OF 2006-2010 AND 2011-2015, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TOGHYANI BEHESHTEH; KIANMEHR MOHAMMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Year:2016 | Volume:34 | Issue:404 Page(s): 1268-1274

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

676

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THESIS STRUCTURE IN TWO POINT TIME OF 2006-2010 AND 2011-2015, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN

Author(s)

TOGHYANI BEHESHTEH | KIANMEHR MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THESISQ3

QUALITYQ2

MEDICAL STUDENTQ3

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to compare the QUALITY changes of MEDICAL STUDENTs’ THESIS before and after implementation of new THESIS regulations.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 100 theses that were written during 2006-2010 and 100 theses from 2011 till 2015 were selected and the QUALITY and quantity of them were assessed based on the university regulations.All data were collected using special questionnaire and then were analyzed using SPSS software.Findings: Type of study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size and adjustment of tables and figures with text content were the most completed parts during the both periods. In contrast, results and discussions were the most incomplete ones during 2006-2010; these parts had improved significantly during the period 2011-2016.Conclusion: According to the present study, the MEDICAL STUDENTs’ theses had no acceptable QUALITY and were not adjusted with new university regulations. They had poor QUALITY in content and were not up-to-date; however, we saw some improvements since 2011-2016 in different aspects of THESIS. Still, it is necessary to qualify the studies by precise assessment and introducing better consultation to students, especially in scientific and statistics fields.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

TOGHYANI, BEHESHTEH, & KIANMEHR, MOHAMMADREZA. (2016). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THESIS STRUCTURE IN TWO POINT TIME OF 2006-2010 AND 2011-2015, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 34(404), 1268-1274. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/50372/en

Vancouver: Copy

TOGHYANI BEHESHTEH, KIANMEHR MOHAMMADREZA. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THESIS STRUCTURE IN TWO POINT TIME OF 2006-2010 AND 2011-2015, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2016;34(404):1268-1274. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/50372/en

IEEE: Copy

BEHESHTEH TOGHYANI, and MOHAMMADREZA KIANMEHR, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THESIS STRUCTURE IN TWO POINT TIME OF 2006-2010 AND 2011-2015, SCHOOL OF MEDICAL, ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, IRAN,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 34, no. 404, pp. 1268–1274, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/50372/en

Related Journal Papers