COMPARISON OF PRIMARY WOUND CLOSURE WITH VACUUM DRAINAGE AND DELAYED CLOSURE IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AGHAEI AFSHAR M.; VAHEDIAN MEHRDAD; ZEYNALINEZHAD H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Year:2003 | Volume:10 | Issue:2 Page(s): 79-84

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,731

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PRIMARY WOUND CLOSURE WITH VACUUM DRAINAGE AND DELAYED CLOSURE IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS

Author(s)

AGHAEI AFSHAR M. | VAHEDIAN MEHRDAD | ZEYNALINEZHAD H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

APPENDICITISQ3

WOUND INFECTIONQ3

DRAINAGEQ3

WOUND CLOSUREQ4

KERMANQ3

Abstract

Open wound management after perforated APPENDICITIS has been a common practice but recently, primary closure has been advocated to reduce costs and morbidity. For comparing delayed closures against primary closure with vacuum DRAINAGE, a randomized experimental study was designed. in KERMAN. Sixty patients with perforated APPENDICITIS divided randomly in two groups and evaluated on day of discharge and 30 days after discharge for complications and morbidity. In first group, wound wasn't closed for 3 days and then closed. In second group, wound was closed after homeostasis and irrigation and then a vacuum drain was separately fixed in wound. In all of the patients type of injected antibiotic was the same. There wasn't any statistically significant difference between the two groups about sex and age. But there was statistically significant difference in duration of hospitalization, and vacuum DRAINAGE group had lower hospitalization (Pv=0.002). None of the cases in both groups had any complication. Primary closure with vacuum DRAINAGE after appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated APPENDICITIS combined with the use of antibiotic therapy in the perioperative period is not associated with an increased risk of incision infection when compared with delayed closure. Primary closure of perforated APPENDICITIS wound with vacuum drain is recommended because of its cost benefit and no additional complication for wound.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AGHAEI AFSHAR, M., VAHEDIAN, MEHRDAD, & ZEYNALINEZHAD, H.. (2003). COMPARISON OF PRIMARY WOUND CLOSURE WITH VACUUM DRAINAGE AND DELAYED CLOSURE IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS. JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 10(2), 79-84. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/508/en

Vancouver: Copy

AGHAEI AFSHAR M., VAHEDIAN MEHRDAD, ZEYNALINEZHAD H.. COMPARISON OF PRIMARY WOUND CLOSURE WITH VACUUM DRAINAGE AND DELAYED CLOSURE IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS. JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2003;10(2):79-84. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/508/en

IEEE: Copy

M. AGHAEI AFSHAR, MEHRDAD VAHEDIAN, and H. ZEYNALINEZHAD, “COMPARISON OF PRIMARY WOUND CLOSURE WITH VACUUM DRAINAGE AND DELAYED CLOSURE IN PERFORATED APPENDICITIS,” JOURNAL OF KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 79–84, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/508/en

Related Journal Papers