KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF FACULTY MEMBERS IN ASSESSING THE
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXAMINATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAJAR SH.; ABEDI P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Inflammatory Diseases Year:2004 | Volume:- | Issue:30 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

261

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF FACULTY MEMBERS IN ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXAMINATIONS

Author(s)

NAJAR SH. | ABEDI P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MEASUREMENT

EXAM QUESTION

TEACHING ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Background: Evaluation is one of the important aspects of teaching activity; and makes it possible to detect the positive and negative aspects of teaching. So evaluation is very important for improvement of quality of higher education in university. Objective: Determining the knowledge and practice of faculty members about validity and reliability of exams. Methods: In this study; 100 faculty members in Ahvaz medical university were selected randomly. Data were gathered via a questionnaire which included 22 questions about validity and reliability. 70 questionnaires returned after 2 months. We used descriptive statistical method for analyzing data. Findings: 80% of subjects knew about content validity; 42.8% about surface validity; 25% about construct validity and 41.5% about possession validity. 41.5% of subjects had knowledge about test-retest; 35.7% about parallel; 42.9% about halves split and 24.2% about kouder-Richardson reliability index. In assessment of practice 45.7% of subjects were using content validity; and 20% test-retest; for validity and reliability of exams . But about other techniques of determining validity and reliability, subjects seemed to fail using them correctly. Conclusion: Knowledge of faculty members about validity and reliability of exams is low ; and using of various kinds of validity and reliability in exams is very low too.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NAJAR, SH., & ABEDI, P.. (2004). KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF FACULTY MEMBERS IN ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXAMINATIONS. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), -(30), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/529686/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAJAR SH., ABEDI P.. KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF FACULTY MEMBERS IN ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXAMINATIONS. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2004;-(30):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/529686/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. NAJAR, and P. ABEDI, “KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF FACULTY MEMBERS IN ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXAMINATIONS,” JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), vol. -, no. 30, pp. 0–0, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/529686/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops