EVALUATION OF PH.D. NURSING ENTRANCE EXAM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PARVIZY S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Education Year:2002 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 (8 SUPPLEMENT) Page(s): 44-44

Download Full-Text

View:

263

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF PH.D. NURSING ENTRANCE EXAM

Author(s)

PARVIZY S.

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Introduction: Human resources are the most important source. It has a basic role in our country especially as a developing country. Postgraduate entrance exams are difficult exams due to fewer universities capacity, its costs and length, it can train our future builders as well. This study will describe & explain the statistical and evaluation criteria of Ph.D. entrance nursing exam in 1379.Methods: This is a descriptive/analytical study of both questions and answers of 1379 nursing doctoral exam.Result: Mean Difficulty indexes varied from 50.56, the most difficult to 60.31, the least difficult and all had correct difficulty indexes. Discriminations indexes varied from 19% (the weakest discrimination index) to 37% and they all didn't have any appropriate filtration rate. At the second part of exam, which was an oral one, the mean and standard deviation were 141.35 and 32.01. All of the difficulty/discriminate and reliability/validity indexes were measured.Conclusion: Meta evaluation is the most important issue in both evaluation and education. Evaluation and interpretation of nursing doctoral exam can be a useful feedback, which can lead us to a better future.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PARVIZY, S.. (2002). EVALUATION OF PH.D. NURSING ENTRANCE EXAM. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2(2 (8 SUPPLEMENT)), 44-44. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/533480/en

Vancouver: Copy

PARVIZY S.. EVALUATION OF PH.D. NURSING ENTRANCE EXAM. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2002;2(2 (8 SUPPLEMENT)):44-44. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/533480/en

IEEE: Copy

S. PARVIZY, “EVALUATION OF PH.D. NURSING ENTRANCE EXAM,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 2, no. 2 (8 SUPPLEMENT), pp. 44–44, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/533480/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops