A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL LATERAL OSTEOTOMY IN RHINOPLASTY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASHEMI M.; MOKHTARINEZHAD F.; OMRANI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS) Year:2005 | Volume:10 | Issue:1 Page(s): 10-15

Download Full-Text

View:

407

Download:

206

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL LATERAL OSTEOTOMY IN RHINOPLASTY

Author(s)

HASHEMI M. | MOKHTARINEZHAD F. | OMRANI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RHINOPLASTY

INTERNAL OSTEOTOMY

EXTERNAL OSTEOTOMY

ECCHYMOSIS

EDEMA

Abstract

Background: Lateral osteotomy is a major part of RHINOPLASTY for remodeling external facet of the nose and narrowing of nasal base and dorsum after removal of the hump. There are two techniques for lateral osteotomy known as external and internal. Each of these provide advantages and impose limitations. The purpose of our study was to compare the severity of postoperative EDEMA and ECCHYMOSIS between internal and EXTERNAL OSTEOTOMY techniques. Methods: This study was designed as a clinical trial on 30 cases. With randomization, one side of the nasal bone was selected for internal approach, and the other side, for external approach. Then, on the 1st and 7th days after surgery, the patients were scored for the severity of EDEMA and ECCHYMOSIS. Results: On the first day after surgery, not only EDEMA, but also ECCHYMOSIS was lower with the EXTERNAL OSTEOTOMY than with the internal approach (P = 0.037, P = 0.002, respectively). The severity of ECCHYMOSIS, on the 7th postoperative day, was lower with the external approach, and the difference was significant (P = 0.011). The severity of both EDEMA and ECCHYMOSIS on the first postoperative day was evaluated higher in females, with statistically significant differences (P = 0.05 for EDEMA and P = 0.003 for ECCHYMOSIS). The extension of ECCHYMOSIS on the 7th postoperative day was higher in women (P = 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two approaches in medialization of the involved bones and no apparent asymmetries either. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, EXTERNAL OSTEOTOMY seems to be the approach of choice, provided that the surgeon has enough experience in doing it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HASHEMI, M., MOKHTARINEZHAD, F., & OMRANI, M.. (2005). A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL LATERAL OSTEOTOMY IN RHINOPLASTY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), 10(1), 10-15. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/536080/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASHEMI M., MOKHTARINEZHAD F., OMRANI M.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL LATERAL OSTEOTOMY IN RHINOPLASTY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS)[Internet]. 2005;10(1):10-15. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/536080/en

IEEE: Copy

M. HASHEMI, F. MOKHTARINEZHAD, and M. OMRANI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL LATERAL OSTEOTOMY IN RHINOPLASTY,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/536080/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops