COMPARISON OF RETENTION RATE OF FISSURE SEALANT WITH AND WITHOUT ENAMEL MECHANICAL PREPARATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

POURHASHEMI S.J.; ASHAYERI N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION OF IRAN (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI) Year:2006 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 (57) Page(s): 93-98

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

597

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RETENTION RATE OF FISSURE SEALANT WITH AND WITHOUT ENAMEL MECHANICAL PREPARATION

Author(s)

POURHASHEMI S.J. | ASHAYERI N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTSQ4

RETENTIONQ2

MECHANICAL PREPARATIONQ4

Abstract

Background and Aim: The caries preventive effect of PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS has been documented and their success, in this regard, is directly related to the RETENTION rate of them. The aim of this study was to compare the RETENTION rate of sealants with and without MECHANICAL PREPARATION of enamel by bur.Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 37 children referred to Pedodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total number of 128 permanent first molars were randomly divided into two groups: Case group (mechanical preparation by bur) and control group (conventional method without bur preparation). Following fissure sealant application, patients were followed up every 4 months. Data were subjected to McNemar test.Results: After one year, the complete RETENTION rate in case group was 81.3% and in control Correspondence: group was 70.3%. Statistical analysis for matched pairs showed statistically significant difference between two groups (P=0.04)Conclusion: The application of bur resulted in superior sealant RETENTION revealing the effectiveness of bur application prior to sealant therapy in caries prevention.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

POURHASHEMI, S.J., & ASHAYERI, N.. (2006). COMPARISON OF RETENTION RATE OF FISSURE SEALANT WITH AND WITHOUT ENAMEL MECHANICAL PREPARATION. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 17(4 (57)), 93-98. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54616/en

Vancouver: Copy

POURHASHEMI S.J., ASHAYERI N.. COMPARISON OF RETENTION RATE OF FISSURE SEALANT WITH AND WITHOUT ENAMEL MECHANICAL PREPARATION. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2006;17(4 (57)):93-98. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54616/en

IEEE: Copy

S.J. POURHASHEMI, and N. ASHAYERI, “COMPARISON OF RETENTION RATE OF FISSURE SEALANT WITH AND WITHOUT ENAMEL MECHANICAL PREPARATION,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 17, no. 4 (57), pp. 93–98, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54616/en

Related Journal Papers