EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN CONVENTIONAL AND PACK ABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHASEMI AMIR; TORABZADEH H.; MOAYEDI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

914

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN CONVENTIONAL AND PACK ABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS

Author(s)

GHASEMI AMIR | TORABZADEH H. | MOAYEDI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PACK ABLE COMPOSITEQ3

CONVENTIONAL COMPOSITEQ3

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: The mechanical properties of composite resin have significant effect on performance and success of a restorative procedure. The aim of present investigation was to evaluate the COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH of conventional and PACK ABLE COMPOSITE materials.Materials and Methods: A stainless steel mold of 4 mm in diameter by 6 mm in height was used to fabricate 50 study specimens. The cylindrical specimens were divided in five groups (n=10). The materials used in this study were Alert, Charmfil Plus, P60, Z100 and Spectrum. Following photo polymerization by using Radi Plus light curing unit (SDI Limited), the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37oC for 48 hours. The specimens were subjected to compressive stress using mechanical testing machine (Zwick/Roell) at cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's Post-hoc tests were employed to determine group differences and the significance level if any of the restorative materials could show significant difference among others.Results: There were significant statistical differences between groups (P<0.05). Z 100 showed the highest and Charmfil Plus demonstrated the lowest amount of COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH. There was no significant statistical difference between Z 100 and P 60, but, differences were significant between Z 100 and other materials.Conclusion: Based on the findings of this investigation, the COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH of packable composites was not proving better than CONVENTIONAL COMPOSITEs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHASEMI, AMIR, TORABZADEH, H., & MOAYEDI, S.. (2009). EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN CONVENTIONAL AND PACK ABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 21(2 (71)), 103-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54636/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHASEMI AMIR, TORABZADEH H., MOAYEDI S.. EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN CONVENTIONAL AND PACK ABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2009;21(2 (71)):103-106. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54636/en

IEEE: Copy

AMIR GHASEMI, H. TORABZADEH, and S. MOAYEDI, “EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN CONVENTIONAL AND PACK ABLE COMPOSITE MATERIALS,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 21, no. 2 (71), pp. 103–106, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54636/en

Related Journal Papers