EVALUATION OF THE APPROVED RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHJOUB HOSSEIN; SADRI GH.H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands Year:2002 | Volume:1 | Issue:4 Page(s): 161-164

Download Full-Text

View:

306

Download:

138

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF THE APPROVED RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Author(s)

MAHJOUB HOSSEIN | SADRI GH.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

QUESTIONNAIRE

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

EVALUATION

SAMPLING

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the research projects in qualitative and quantitative terms is necessary to clarify their advantages and disadvantages and to resolve the possible failures.Purpose: The study aims to assess the quality of the approved research projects. The objective is to determine whether the design of the research in the approved proposals is accurate in regard of different scientific aspects.Methods QUESTIONNAIREs of 78 approved RESEARCH PROPOSALs in University of Medical Sciences, which were conducted by a faculty member, has been evaluated in terms of the principles of SAMPLING, study methodology and consistency between these two items.Results: Mistakes in SAMPLING techniques, with a rate of 45.2%, were more evident than other items. 10.3% of study methodologies were incorrect, and the consistency of methodology and SAMPLING was inaccurate in 26.7% of projects. 53.8% of projects had some kind of mistake in them. Conclusion: Holding advanced workshops on RESEARCH METHODOLOGY and more strict supervision at the time of approving research projects are recommended.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHJOUB, HOSSEIN, & SADRI, GH.H.. (2002). EVALUATION OF THE APPROVED RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1(4), 161-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/547295/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHJOUB HOSSEIN, SADRI GH.H.. EVALUATION OF THE APPROVED RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2002;1(4):161-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/547295/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN MAHJOUB, and GH.H. SADRI, “EVALUATION OF THE APPROVED RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN HAMEDAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 161–164, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/547295/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops