CONTRAST SENSITIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO THIN LENSES, THINOPTX® VERSUS ACRISMART®, AFTER MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MIRZAEI MOHAMMAD; LOTFI SADIGH A.; MIRZAEI AMANEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology Year:2009 | Volume:21 | Issue:4 Page(s): 72-75

Download Full-Text

View:

383

Download:

157

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO THIN LENSES, THINOPTX® VERSUS ACRISMART®, AFTER MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY

Author(s)

MIRZAEI MOHAMMAD | LOTFI SADIGH A. | MIRZAEI AMANEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY

SPATIAL FREQUENCIES

MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY

THIN LENS

Abstract

Purpose: CONTRAST SENSITIVITY (CS) evaluation by SV–1000E chart in all SPATIAL FREQUENCIES after MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY (MICS) and its comparison between two THIN LENSes after optical correction in natural and glare conditions.Methods: In this cross sectional study, 100 eyes having MICS with Dodick ARC phacolaser system were evaluated. 50 Thinoptx lenses and 50 Acrismart lenses were randomly implanted in the eyes. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive error and CS, in all SPATIAL FREQUENCIES were measured three months after surgery. CSV-1000E chart with or without glare test was used for CS evaluation. Normalized measures of CS were compared between two THIN LENSes with Student’s T-test. Results: CS profile was within the normal range in 52% of eyes and 48% of eyes had CS in lower than the normal range. The differences of CS in lower SPATIAL FREQUENCIES [3 and 6 cycle/degree (c/d)] and higher SPATIAL FREQUENCIES (12 and 18 c/d) between two lenses were not significant (P<0.449 and P<0.835, respectively).Conclusion: After implantation of two lenses by MICS, the CS in all SPATIAL FREQUENCIES was similar.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MIRZAEI, MOHAMMAD, LOTFI SADIGH, A., & MIRZAEI, AMANEH. (2009). CONTRAST SENSITIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO THIN LENSES, THINOPTX® VERSUS ACRISMART®, AFTER MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY. JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 21(4), 72-75. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/563313/en

Vancouver: Copy

MIRZAEI MOHAMMAD, LOTFI SADIGH A., MIRZAEI AMANEH. CONTRAST SENSITIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO THIN LENSES, THINOPTX® VERSUS ACRISMART®, AFTER MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY. JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY[Internet]. 2009;21(4):72-75. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/563313/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MIRZAEI, A. LOTFI SADIGH, and AMANEH MIRZAEI, “CONTRAST SENSITIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO THIN LENSES, THINOPTX® VERSUS ACRISMART®, AFTER MICRO INCISION CATARACT SURGERY,” JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 72–75, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/563313/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops