COMPARISION OF THE CAG A+ HELICOBACTER PYLORI FREQUENCY BETWEEN ROSACEA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROL GROUP

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAMANIAN ABBAS; MOBAIEN AHMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Dermatology Year:2010 | Volume:13 | Issue:4 (54) Page(s): 128-130

Download Full-Text

View:

312

Download:

125

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISION OF THE CAG A+ HELICOBACTER PYLORI FREQUENCY BETWEEN ROSACEA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROL GROUP

Author(s)

ZAMANIAN ABBAS | MOBAIEN AHMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HELICOBACTER PYLORI

ROSACEA

CAG A

ANTIBODY

Abstract

Background: ROSACEA is a chronic skin disease with an unknown etiology. Some reports have suggested an increased prevalence of HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection in ROSACEA patients, but it is controversial. This study was designed to compare the prevalence of H. pylori and serological CAG A+species between the ROSACEA patients and the healthy control group.Methods: This case-control study was performed on 30 ROSACEA patients and 60 healthy individuals as the control group. The results were reported based on clinical and serological enzymelinked immunosorbent assay IgG ANTIBODY and CAG A examination in two groups.Results: Mean age of the ROSACEA patients and the control group was 45.8±14.05 and 41.4±12.3 years respectively and 56.7% of the patients and 86.2% of controls were infected by H. Pylori (P=0.002). Furthermore, CAG A+was seen in 53.5% of the patients and 50% of the controls (P=0.23).Conclusion: This study showed a reduction in the prevalence of HELICOBACTER PYLORI in acne ROSACEA patients compared to other studies in the world. The authors believe that it is necessary to conduct more studies to demonstrate the exact prevalence of this organism in Iranian ROSACEA patients.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAMANIAN, ABBAS, & MOBAIEN, AHMADREZA. (2010). COMPARISION OF THE CAG A+ HELICOBACTER PYLORI FREQUENCY BETWEEN ROSACEA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROL GROUP. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 13(4 (54)), 128-130. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/571591/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAMANIAN ABBAS, MOBAIEN AHMADREZA. COMPARISION OF THE CAG A+ HELICOBACTER PYLORI FREQUENCY BETWEEN ROSACEA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROL GROUP. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY[Internet]. 2010;13(4 (54)):128-130. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/571591/en

IEEE: Copy

ABBAS ZAMANIAN, and AHMADREZA MOBAIEN, “COMPARISION OF THE CAG A+ HELICOBACTER PYLORI FREQUENCY BETWEEN ROSACEA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROL GROUP,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, vol. 13, no. 4 (54), pp. 128–130, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/571591/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops