Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

285
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GODELS ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT

Pages

  53-76

Abstract

 In 1970, Gödel showed his ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT to Dana Scott and discussed it with him. Afterwards, Scott presented a slightly different version of the argument at Princeton University. The logical system of the argument is a second-order quantified S5-modal logic with identity and an abstraction operator. Granted the acceptability of the underlying logical system, GODELs conclusion that necessarily there exists a GOD-LIKE being) can be derived from the premises-with GODEL and Scott on the scene, who can say otherwise? Sobel, however, proved that the system faces modal collapse-i.e. P↔ðP is derivable from the system. Responding to Sobel, Anderson tried to block this by weakening some axioms and definitions.In this paper, I will be trying to consider GODELs ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (Scotts version) from a logical point of view, along with Sobels criticism and Andersons emendations.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RANAEE, MAHDI. (2012). GODELS ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES), 1(3 (5)), 53-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/579365/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RANAEE MAHDI. GODELS ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES)[Internet]. 2012;1(3 (5)):53-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/579365/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHDI RANAEE, “GODELS ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT,” MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES), vol. 1, no. 3 (5), pp. 53–76, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/579365/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    مرکز اطلاعات علمی SID
    strs
    دانشگاه امام حسین
    بنیاد ملی بازیهای رایانه ای
    کلید پژوه
    ایران سرچ
    ایران سرچ
    File Not Exists.
    Move to top