COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS: AN APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MEYDANI Z.; SAFDARI R.; FARSHID FAR GH.R.; LAK BALA P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Hormozgan Medical Journal Year:2006 | Volume:10 | Issue:2 Page(s): 167-172

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,571

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS: AN APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

Author(s)

MEYDANI Z. | SAFDARI R. | FARSHID FAR GH.R. | LAK BALA P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MEDICAL RECORDSQ3

MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMSQ3

COMPUTERIZEDQ3

INFORMATION MANAGEMENTQ2

ACCREDITATIONQ2

Abstract

Introduction: The ACCREDITATION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (IM) standards by affecting various aspects of the EHR have a strong impact on the adoption of the EHR systems. Regarding this importance, conducting a comparative study related to IM standards in pioneer countries can facilitate a standardization movement for developing IM standards and reviewing MEDICAL RECORDS standards in our country.Methods: This is a comparative-descriptive study in which the IM standards for the national ACCREDITATION agencies of Canada (CCHSA), USA (JCAHO) and New Zealand (QHNZ) were collected and investigated through the internet, and e-mail.Results: The finding of the study revealed that adopted IM standards in these countries focus on the timely entry, defining the time frame within which record must be completed, standardized methods of defining, coding, classifying, gathering data from various sources, linking and combining different types of information from outside and inside the organization and confidentiality. Conclusion: Generally, all agencies relying upon IM standards, not only improve INFORMATION MANAGEMENT processes, MEDICAL RECORDS and ensuring health care quality, but also provide a basis for reinforcement of health information systems and EHR. Because INFORMATION MANAGEMENT processes and MEDICAL RECORDS in our country have many shortcomings and deficiencies, a standardization movement in order to develop IM standards and reviewing MEDICAL RECORDS standards regarding to EHR is a necessity.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MEYDANI, Z., SAFDARI, R., FARSHID FAR, GH.R., & LAK BALA, P.. (2006). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS: AN APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 10(2), 167-172. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/60218/en

Vancouver: Copy

MEYDANI Z., SAFDARI R., FARSHID FAR GH.R., LAK BALA P.. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS: AN APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2006;10(2):167-172. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/60218/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. MEYDANI, R. SAFDARI, GH.R. FARSHID FAR, and P. LAK BALA, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS: AN APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD,” HORMOZGAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/60218/en

Related Journal Papers