COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA IN ANIMAL MODELS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MARJANI MEHDI; MEHRVAR AMIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE Year:2012 | Volume:34 | Issue:79 Page(s): 51-57

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

992

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA IN ANIMAL MODELS

Author(s)

MARJANI MEHDI | MEHRVAR AMIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIAQ2

INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIAQ2

ANESTHETIC DRUG ADMINISTRATIONQ2

ANIMAL MODELQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Various methods are used for inducing anesthesia. This study compared intravenous and intraosseous propofol anesthesia in the ANIMAL MODEL.Materials and methods: 12 healthy adult cats (5 male and 7 female) in two groups, intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) were studied. In both IV and IO group’s 8 mg propofol per kg body weight was injected. Heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse rate, rectal temperature, ETCo2, SPO2, quality of anesthesia and recovery were evaluated and recorded before and after injection of propofol in 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes. Independent t test was used and a p value<0.05 was considered to be significant.Results: The average recovery time in the (IV) method was 52.5±9.72 minutes and in the (IO) method 26.14±90 minutes and there was no significant difference for recovery time (p=0.549). Information about depth of anesthesia (p=0.1171) and quality of recovery (p=0.3404) were found to have no significant difference p> (0.05).Discussion: Satisfactory results were recorded in anesthesia with propofol in both intravenous and intraosseous groups. INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA is desirable and faster in emergency situations in and cases with difficult vascular access.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MARJANI, MEHDI, & MEHRVAR, AMIN. (2012). COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA IN ANIMAL MODELS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 34(79), 51-57. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63205/en

Vancouver: Copy

MARJANI MEHDI, MEHRVAR AMIN. COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA IN ANIMAL MODELS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2012;34(79):51-57. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63205/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI MARJANI, and AMIN MEHRVAR, “COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAOSSEOUS ANESTHESIA IN ANIMAL MODELS,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 34, no. 79, pp. 51–57, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63205/en

Related Journal Papers