EVALUATION OF TWO METHODS OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ISOFLORANE IN PATIENTS ON UROD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALIMI A.R.; SAFARI F.; KAMALI FARD M.; YAHYAVI P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,928

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF TWO METHODS OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ISOFLORANE IN PATIENTS ON UROD

Author(s)

SALIMI A.R. | SAFARI F. | KAMALI FARD M. | YAHYAVI P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

URODQ3

PROPOFOLQ3

ISOFLORSANEQ2

PACUQ2

Abstract

Background: Fear of withdrawal syndrome, is a common reason for addicts to continue their addiction. Researchers have tried to find solutions. Anesthesia is the main part of UROD and PROPOFOL is a common hypnotic for UROD. However a drug of choice has not been found until now.Materials and Methods: 100 ASA Class I patients were chosen. Candidates allocated randomly into two groups in a controlled clinical trial. Premedication and induction of anesthesia were the same for the two groups. The case group received isoflorane 0.4-1% for maintenance of anesthesia, and the control group received PROPOFOL 80-150, mg/kg/min as the maintenance hypnotic.blood pressure, pulse rate and any arrythmia were recorded during the anesthesia. Also pain, nausea and vomiting were recorded in PACU for two hours.Results: There were no significant differences in mean age, sex, proprtions and mean weight between the two groups. There were no significant differences in blood pressure or pulse rate between the two groups during the anesthesia. There were no significant differences in rate nausea and vomiting and severity of pain between the two groups in PACU.Discussion and Conclusion: Isoflorane is an acceptable alternative for PROPOFOL in UROD. This research proves that isoflorane in comparison with PROPOFOL (golden standard) has the same efficacy in controlling hemodynamic during anesthesia and complications in PACU.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALIMI, A.R., SAFARI, F., KAMALI FARD, M., & YAHYAVI, P.. (2007). EVALUATION OF TWO METHODS OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ISOFLORANE IN PATIENTS ON UROD. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 29(59), 50-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63307/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALIMI A.R., SAFARI F., KAMALI FARD M., YAHYAVI P.. EVALUATION OF TWO METHODS OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ISOFLORANE IN PATIENTS ON UROD. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2007;29(59):50-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63307/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. SALIMI, F. SAFARI, M. KAMALI FARD, and P. YAHYAVI, “EVALUATION OF TWO METHODS OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND ISOFLORANE IN PATIENTS ON UROD,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 29, no. 59, pp. 50–54, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63307/en

Related Journal Papers