A COMPARISON OF RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSION IN REP AIRING SKIN DEFECTS REGARDING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HISTOLOGIC CHANGES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PARNIA R.; ENSHAIE A.; SALARI SH.; TAGHIZADIEH M.; GHANDILI L.; MALEKPOUR N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Studies in Medical Sciences Year:2006 | Volume:17 | Issue:3 Page(s): 169-174

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

645

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSION IN REP AIRING SKIN DEFECTS REGARDING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HISTOLOGIC CHANGES

Author(s)

Keywords

RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSIONQ3

CLINICAL OUTCOMEQ3

HISTOLOGICAL CHANGESQ3

Abstract

Background finds Aims: Nowadays, tissue expansion is used for repairing skin defects. Traditionally, duration for operating was about 4 to 6 weeks but according to recent articles it can take less time as 72 to 96 hours. CLINICAL OUTCOMEs and histologic changes of these two methods are compared in recent studies.Methods and Materials: 20 patients were randomly allocated and studied during a year in two separate groups. Because of severe complications, 3 patients were removed from the study. Among 17 patients, 8 persons (47.1%) were male and 9 persons (52.9%) were female. Rapid tissue expansion (72 hours) was used in one group and traditional method (6 weeks) was used in the other one.Results: There is no significant statistical difference of expanded skin adequacy, color of skin, and complication rate between two groups. Further more, there is no significant histologic difference except for the changes of epidermis and vessels.Discussion: According to the results of the study and comparing them with recent articles and studies, it seems that rapid tissue expansion is a secure, efficient, and reliable method especially if it is done individually and in a desired condition.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

PARNIA, R., ENSHAIE, A., SALARI, SH., TAGHIZADIEH, M., GHANDILI, L., & MALEKPOUR, N.. (2006). A COMPARISON OF RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSION IN REP AIRING SKIN DEFECTS REGARDING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HISTOLOGIC CHANGES. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), 17(3), 169-174. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/64061/en

Vancouver: Copy

PARNIA R., ENSHAIE A., SALARI SH., TAGHIZADIEH M., GHANDILI L., MALEKPOUR N.. A COMPARISON OF RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSION IN REP AIRING SKIN DEFECTS REGARDING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HISTOLOGIC CHANGES. STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES)[Internet]. 2006;17(3):169-174. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/64061/en

IEEE: Copy

R. PARNIA, A. ENSHAIE, SH. SALARI, M. TAGHIZADIEH, L. GHANDILI, and N. MALEKPOUR, “A COMPARISON OF RAPID AND SLOW TISSUE EXPANSION IN REP AIRING SKIN DEFECTS REGARDING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND HISTOLOGIC CHANGES,” STUDIES IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (THE JOURNAL OF URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCINCES), vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/64061/en

Related Journal Papers