مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

7,045
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF THREE METHODS IN ESTIMATION OF DELIVERY DATE

Pages

  45-51

Abstract

 Introduction: Estimation of delivery date based on last menstrual period and ULTRASOUND is common in prenatal care. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of NAEGEL’S RULE, Naegel’s revised rule and ULTRASOUND in estimation of delivery date.Methods: This cross-sectional study was done on 540 pregnant women hospitalized in Mobayyeni Hospital in Sabzevar (2007-2008) due sign of to LABOR. Estimated delivery date was calculated based on three methods and difference between these and ture date of LABOR calculated. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistical indices, Pearson correlation and T-test using Spss15. Results: Results showed that delivery happened in 6.3, 6.3 and 6.7 percent of women just on the stimated date by NAEGEL’S RULE, Naegel’s revised rule and ULTRASOUND respectively and delivery happened in 51.9, 67.2 and 60.7 percent of them until the estimated date. The difference between true date and the estimated date by NAEGEL’S RULE and ULTRASOUND were correlated significantly with fundal height and birth weight (p<0.001). Post term delivery rates were 0.4, 1.9 and 0.6 percent respectively, based on ULTRASOUND reports, NAEGEL’S RULE and Naegel’s revised rule. Conclusion: NAEGEL’S RULE is more accurate in prediction of delivery date, compared to other similar studies. Using ULTRASOUND prolongs the period preceding the beginning of LABOR. Using Naegel’s revised rule strongly brings better results.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORTAZAVI, F.A.S., & AKABERI, A.. (2010). THE STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF THREE METHODS IN ESTIMATION OF DELIVERY DATE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, 13(5), 45-51. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/64787/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORTAZAVI F.A.S., AKABERI A.. THE STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF THREE METHODS IN ESTIMATION OF DELIVERY DATE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2010;13(5):45-51. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/64787/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F.A.S. MORTAZAVI, and A. AKABERI, “THE STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF THREE METHODS IN ESTIMATION OF DELIVERY DATE,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 45–51, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/64787/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button