مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,334
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF 5% MEPERIDINE WITH 5% LIDOCAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN 50 CASES OF NON-EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION

Pages

  9-14

Abstract

 The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of using 5% meperidine for SPINAL ANESTHESIA in patients undergoing non-emergency CESAREAN SECTION and also to compare it with heavy lidocaine. Fifty full term pregnant women. with ASA physical status I or II, presenting for non-emergency CESAREAN SECTION under SPINAL ANESTHESIA were randomly divided into two groups with 25 in each. All patients received IV 15 ml/kg Ringer's solution 15 minutes prior to block, and IV 10 mg metoclopramide just before entering the O.R. For SPINAL ANESTHESIA, patients were given either 5% meperidine 1.25 mg/kg or 5% heavy lidocaine 60-75 mg intrathecally. The sensory blockade in all except two patients in the lidocaine group and one patient in the meperidine group, who required sedation and analgesia during surgery, was adequate for CESAREAN SECTION. None of the mothers suffered from any major side effects. The incidence of hypotension was lower in the meperidine group than in lidocaine group (p < 0.05). All the newborns in both groups cried immediately after birth and had an Apgar score greater than 7. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was 371 ± 24 minutes in the meperidine group and 146 ± 7 minutes in the lidocaine group (p < 0.001). It is concluded that intrathecal 5% meperidine in a dose of 1.25mg/kg is superior to 5% heavy lidocaine because the incidence of hypotension is lower and the duration of postoperative analgesia is so much longer. The commercial 5% solution of meperidine can be used without adding any additive for this purpose.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAD, H., RAEISI, K., & HOSSEINIAN, S.. (2001). A COMPARISON OF 5% MEPERIDINE WITH 5% LIDOCAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN 50 CASES OF NON-EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, 3(5-6), 9-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/65283/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAD H., RAEISI K., HOSSEINIAN S.. A COMPARISON OF 5% MEPERIDINE WITH 5% LIDOCAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN 50 CASES OF NON-EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2001;3(5-6):9-14. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/65283/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. RAD, K. RAEISI, and S. HOSSEINIAN, “A COMPARISON OF 5% MEPERIDINE WITH 5% LIDOCAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN 50 CASES OF NON-EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, vol. 3, no. 5-6, pp. 9–14, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/65283/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top