Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVAHERI M.R.; ABDI A.; Mashaee N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY Year:2020 | Volume:24 | Issue:2 (83) Page(s): 387-400

Download Full-Text

View:

101

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources

Author(s)

JAVAHERI M.R. | ABDI A. | Mashaee N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

independence in judgement

despotism in judgement

judgement

two ethical ways

holly quran

progeny of prophet

Abstract

Judges sometimes make the distinction between independence and despotism when deciding on a sentence that can only be distinguished by understanding its nature and criteria. All the written works in this field dealt with the judge's independence from legal, jurisprudential and political perspectives and lacked any insight into their understanding. It was possible to solve such a problem in a network of different domains. The purpose of this study is to solve these two ethical paths through a religious domain based on insight. Method: The research method in this study is analytical and applied based on valid library resources. Results: Extraction of four criteria: "correctness of attitude towards the origin of existence", "recognition of analytical capacities and emotional limitations", "real recognition of the origins of spiritual knowledge and its attachment", "consideration of assignment, formulation and developmental judgment" In addition to the judiciary, it was also essential for individual and organizational decision-making. Conclusion: This study stated the criteria, indicators and instances of independence and despotism with regard to the field of vision, so that the referees in the situations faced can be able to depart from these two ethical paths.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVAHERI, M.R., ABDI, A., & Mashaee, N.. (2020). Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, 24(2 (83) ), 387-400. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/662981/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVAHERI M.R., ABDI A., Mashaee N.. Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2020;24(2 (83) ):387-400. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/662981/en

IEEE: Copy

M.R. JAVAHERI, A. ABDI, and N. Mashaee, “Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources,” KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, vol. 24, no. 2 (83) , pp. 387–400, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/662981/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops