A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULLA SADRA'S THEORY OF GRADED HIERARCHY (TASHKIK) AND AQUINAS'S ANALOGY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAKAIE GHASEM; RAHMANI MANSOUREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Of Religious Thought Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:41 Page(s): 127-156

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

671

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULLA SADRA'S THEORY OF GRADED HIERARCHY (TASHKIK) AND AQUINAS'S ANALOGY

Author(s)

KAKAIE GHASEM | RAHMANI MANSOUREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MULLA SADRAQ2

TOMAS AQUINASQ2

ANALOGYQ2

GRADED HIERARCHYQ2

DIVINE ATTRIBUTESQ2

Abstract

Understanding and analyzing the true meaning of DIVINE ATTRIBUTES has been one of the most important questions of theologians, philosophers and mystics. Different views have been presented in this regard. Limitations of human language, from one side, and infinity of God's being from the other side have maken it difficult to achieve a clear explanation of DIVINE ATTRIBUTES. MULLA SADRA says that DIVINE ATTRIBUTES and human attributes share not only in expression but also in meaning and in a GRADED HIERARCHY so he makes it possible to preserve God's transcendence from one side and to understand the meaning of God's positive attributes, from the other side. Thomas Aquinas, also, attempts to avoid both anthropomorphism and isolation regarding God's attributes. He denys both sharing in expression and sharing in meaning in relation to divine and human attributes and defends the theory of ANALOGY. In this paper we will discuss and compare these two views.

Cites

No record.

References

نگاهی به زبان

Cite

APA: Copy

KAKAIE, GHASEM, & RAHMANI, MANSOUREH. (2012). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULLA SADRA'S THEORY OF GRADED HIERARCHY (TASHKIK) AND AQUINAS'S ANALOGY. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, -(41), 127-156. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/66712/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAKAIE GHASEM, RAHMANI MANSOUREH. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULLA SADRA'S THEORY OF GRADED HIERARCHY (TASHKIK) AND AQUINAS'S ANALOGY. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT[Internet]. 2012;-(41):127-156. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/66712/en

IEEE: Copy

GHASEM KAKAIE, and MANSOUREH RAHMANI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULLA SADRA'S THEORY OF GRADED HIERARCHY (TASHKIK) AND AQUINAS'S ANALOGY,” JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, vol. -, no. 41, pp. 127–156, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/66712/en

Related Journal Papers