Metaanalyzing Foucault’ s Archaeology Theory

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Zare Mehrjardy Masoud; YOUSOFI ALI; Mirabi Saeideh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES Year:2021 | Volume:20 | Issue:12 Page(s): 195-220

Download Full-Text

View:

123

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Metaanalyzing Foucault’ s Archaeology Theory

Author(s)

Zare Mehrjardy Masoud | YOUSOFI ALI | Mirabi Saeideh | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Discourse

Archive

Archaeology

Meta-theory

Abstract

Foucault’ s theoretical foundations have often undergone significant rotations. Foucault’ s commentators usually divide his scientific period into the duality of archeology-genealogy or the triad of archeology-genealogy-ethics. In this paper, Foucault’ s archeology was analyzed through a meta-theoretical approach based on a combined model. This model is a selection of Ritzer’ s meta-theoretical logic (including four external-social, internal-social, external-intellectual, and internal-intellectual approaches) and Chalabi’ s conceptual package (including four analytical elements of theory including theory-building equipment, theoretical claims range, theoretical functions, and Theoretical construction). The results show that although archeology is less important to researchers than genealogy; however, in addition to being an efficient theoretical approach to historical, sociological research, it provides a different perspective on society, history, knowledge, and knowledge; It is also a methodological approach with separate guidelines and with a fluid and flexible structure that can be used effectively in dynamic sociological, historical research and make it dynamic. The most important criticisms of Archaeology are the neglect of political and historical complexities, the failure of the Archaeology of knowledge as the subject of succession to epistemology, and philosophical vacuum and refusal to search for a meaningful source for restoring the scattered historical determination of human.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Zare Mehrjardy, Masoud, YOUSOFI, ALI, & Mirabi, Saeideh. (2021). Metaanalyzing Foucault’ s Archaeology Theory. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 20(12 ), 195-220. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/671853/en

Vancouver: Copy

Zare Mehrjardy Masoud, YOUSOFI ALI, Mirabi Saeideh. Metaanalyzing Foucault’ s Archaeology Theory. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2021;20(12 ):195-220. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/671853/en

IEEE: Copy

Masoud Zare Mehrjardy, ALI YOUSOFI, and Saeideh Mirabi, “Metaanalyzing Foucault’ s Archaeology Theory,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 20, no. 12 , pp. 195–220, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/671853/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops