مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

65
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

52
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: Pain medicine Fellowship applicants often seek information about programs from the Internet, which is becoming even more relevant with the transition to virtual interviews as a consequence of the global pandemic. Previous literature has revealed the signifi cance of training program Websites as part of the application process in other specialties. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the content, design, organization, and user friendliness by using a composite score to determine the quality of the Pain medicine Fellowship Websites (PMFW). Methods: Accredited Pain medicine Fellowship programs was queried from three databases for Pain medicine education: (1) Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS); (2) the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA); and (3) the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Programs that appeared within one and/or more databases were eligible for study inclusion. PMFW were evaluated for the accessibility of Recruitment and education content items. The quality of PMFW was determined as multifactorial composed of four dimensions: content, design, organization, and user friendliness. Results: For program Recruitment, PMFW contained an average of 12 4. 0 of 32 content items (38%) for Fellowship programs: (1) 83% of Fellowship programs specifi ed the number of positions available for the 2021 Match; (2) 17% indicated alumni career placement; (3) 6. 8% supplied interview dates; and (4) merely 4. 9% detailed the selection process. For program education, PMFW contained an average of 7 3. 4 of 16 content items (44%): (1) 70% of programs provided a rotation schedule; (2) 49% detailed operative experiences; and (3) just 16% included simulation training. Regarding the quality based on content, design, organization, and user friendliness, the average PMFW was not “ good” with only 1% of PMFW meeting “ great” standards. A kappa value of 0. 92 was calculated for interrater reliability. Conclusions: The web presence of Pain medicine Fellowship programs falls short of providing essential accessibility, content, design, organization, and user friendliness to allow applicants to adequately access information about program characteristics. There are ample opportunities to increase the eff ectiveness of PMFW to benefi t training programs and to inform prospective applicants, especially given the rise of virtual applications and interviews.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Mukhdomi, Taif, Woolley, Parker, Mukhdomi, Junaid, Beck, Brandon, Patel, Deeran, Harris, Marcus, Yadav, Abhishek, & Kendall, Mark C.. (2021). An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs. ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE, 11(3), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/680268/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Mukhdomi Taif, Woolley Parker, Mukhdomi Junaid, Beck Brandon, Patel Deeran, Harris Marcus, Yadav Abhishek, Kendall Mark C.. An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs. ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2021;11(3):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/680268/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Taif Mukhdomi, Parker Woolley, Junaid Mukhdomi, Brandon Beck, Deeran Patel, Marcus Harris, Abhishek Yadav, and Mark C. Kendall, “An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs,” ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 0–0, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/680268/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button