مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

256
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

140
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TRACHEAL STENOSIS AND CUFF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF MINIMAL OCCLUSIVE VOLUME AND PALPATION TECHNIQUES

Pages

  252-256

Abstract

 Background: TRACHEAl stenosis, which has received more emphasis recently, is a common post intubation complication and may develop due to different reasons. One important reason is the endoTRACHEAl tube CUFF PRESSURE. Therefore, this study sought to examine the accuracy of diagnostic test for palpation and minimal occlusive volume techniques to measure the endoTRACHEAl tube CUFF PRESSURE.Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study, the accuracy of diagnostic tests for palpation and minimal occlusive volume techniques to measure the endoTRACHEAl tube CUFF PRESSURE was assessed in 101 patients aged over 18 years who had undergone open heart surgery and post-surgical mechanical ventilation in the ICU.Results: In the palpation technique, the CUFF PRESSURE of 27 patients (26.7%) was reported to be out of the permissible range and for the rest of them (74 patients, 73.3%) it was within the permissible range. Then, the CUFF PRESSURE was checked by the standard method using a manometer and after comparing the results it was found that the CUFF PRESSURE of 92 patients (91.1%) was not in the permissible range and only nine patients (8.9%) had a CUFF PRESSURE within the permissible range (20-30 cm H2O). In minimal occlusive volume method compared with the standard method, 22 patients (21.7%) had CUFF PRESSURE within the permissible range of 20-30 cm H2O, and 79 of them (78.2%) had CUFF PRESSURE out of the permissible range and higher than the upper limit.Conclusion: This study recommends that the best way to measure the endoTRACHEAl tube CUFF PRESSURE is to use a cuff manometer, and when it is not available, the minimal occlusive volume would be a better alternative compared to the palpation technique to keep the CUFF PRESSURE within a proper range to avoid tracheotomy complications such as TRACHEAl stenosis.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TOTONCHI, ZIAE, JALILI, FATEMEH, HASHEMIAN, SEYED MOHAMMADREZA, & JABARDARJANI, HAMID REZA. (2015). TRACHEAL STENOSIS AND CUFF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF MINIMAL OCCLUSIVE VOLUME AND PALPATION TECHNIQUES. TANAFFOS, 14(4), 252-256. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/686051/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TOTONCHI ZIAE, JALILI FATEMEH, HASHEMIAN SEYED MOHAMMADREZA, JABARDARJANI HAMID REZA. TRACHEAL STENOSIS AND CUFF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF MINIMAL OCCLUSIVE VOLUME AND PALPATION TECHNIQUES. TANAFFOS[Internet]. 2015;14(4):252-256. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/686051/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ZIAE TOTONCHI, FATEMEH JALILI, SEYED MOHAMMADREZA HASHEMIAN, and HAMID REZA JABARDARJANI, “TRACHEAL STENOSIS AND CUFF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF MINIMAL OCCLUSIVE VOLUME AND PALPATION TECHNIQUES,” TANAFFOS, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 252–256, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/686051/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button