THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PACE MAKER INSTALLMENT VIA SUB-CLAVIAN VEIN AND THE INSTALLATION OF PACE MAKER VIA CEPHALIC VEIN CONCERNING SHORT TERM SIDE EFFECT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOTAHEDI B.; NIKOUEIAN M.H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Internal Medicine Today Year:2006 | Volume:12 | Issue:3 Page(s): 29-32

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,020

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PACE MAKER INSTALLMENT VIA SUB-CLAVIAN VEIN AND THE INSTALLATION OF PACE MAKER VIA CEPHALIC VEIN CONCERNING SHORT TERM SIDE EFFECT

Author(s)

MOTAHEDI B. | NIKOUEIAN M.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PACE MAKERQ4

SUB-CLAVIAN VEINQ3

CEPHALIC VEINQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: The first step in implanting pacemaker is finding a suitable venous way. We can pass the lead through cutting down the CEPHALIC VEIN or external jugular or even the internal jugular. It is also possible to locate a larger vein through skin and pass the lead though it after making a fissure in it. The aim of this study is comparing two methods of implanting pacemaker through subclavian vein and cutting down the CEPHALIC VEIN in deltopectoral pathway concerning short-term side effects.Materials and Methods: From early 1997 up to the end of 2001, 352 patients were provided with permanent pacemaker. After the analysis of these patients they were divided into two groups: In group A including 164 patients (46.6%) the pacemaker was implanted through subclavian and in group B including 188 patients (53.4%), the cutting down CEPHALIC VEIN method was used. The results were compared by statistical analysis of side effects of these two methods. Results: Pneumothorax was seen in one case of group A (0.6%) patients. There was injury infection in a patient from group A (0. 6%) and two patients from group B (106%). A case of generator displacement was also seen in each group. There was neither case of air embolism nor the damage to the veins.Conclusion: The study shows that although there is no remarkable statistical difference between the two groups concerning the individual side-effect, the subclavian vein method had more side effects than the cut down CEPHALIC VEIN which is statistically remarkable when collective side-effects are concerned.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOTAHEDI, B., & NIKOUEIAN, M.H.. (2006). THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PACE MAKER INSTALLMENT VIA SUB-CLAVIAN VEIN AND THE INSTALLATION OF PACE MAKER VIA CEPHALIC VEIN CONCERNING SHORT TERM SIDE EFFECT. OFOGH-E-DANESH, 12(3), 29-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68830/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOTAHEDI B., NIKOUEIAN M.H.. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PACE MAKER INSTALLMENT VIA SUB-CLAVIAN VEIN AND THE INSTALLATION OF PACE MAKER VIA CEPHALIC VEIN CONCERNING SHORT TERM SIDE EFFECT. OFOGH-E-DANESH[Internet]. 2006;12(3):29-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68830/en

IEEE: Copy

B. MOTAHEDI, and M.H. NIKOUEIAN, “THE COMPARISON BETWEEN PACE MAKER INSTALLMENT VIA SUB-CLAVIAN VEIN AND THE INSTALLATION OF PACE MAKER VIA CEPHALIC VEIN CONCERNING SHORT TERM SIDE EFFECT,” OFOGH-E-DANESH, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 29–32, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68830/en

Related Journal Papers