TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND LIST EQUIVALENCY OF PERSIAN QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST IN AZERI-PERSIAN BILINGUALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHEISSI ELAHEH; FATAHI JAMILEH; FARAHANI SAEID; JALAIE SHOHREH; TAHAEI ALI AKBAR

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Auditory and Vestibular Research Journal Year:2017 | Volume:26 | Issue:3 Page(s): 157-162

Download Full-Text

View:

316

Download:

156

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND LIST EQUIVALENCY OF PERSIAN QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST IN AZERI-PERSIAN BILINGUALS

Author(s)

Keywords

BILINGUAL

LIST EQUIVALENCY

MONOLINGUAL

QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST

RELIABILITY

Abstract

Background and Aim: The quick speech in noise (Q-SIN) test results have been reported to be entirely different in MONOLINGUALs compared to BILINGUALs. We attempted to assess the RELIABILITY and equivalency of the Persian Q-SIN test in Azeri-Persian BILINGUALs.Methods: The Q-SIN test was performed on 51 Persian MONOLINGUALs and 51 Azeri-Persian BILINGUALs by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th lists binaurally under headphone. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss was determined for each group. The RELIABILITY was evaluated on 30 BILINGUALs.Results: There was no gender effect on all results in both groups. The mean SNR losses of four lists were -1.19 and -0.8dB in MONOLINGUALs and BILINGUALs, respectively, also they were within normal limits in both groups. The mean SNR losses for all lists in MONOLINGUALs were better than those in BILINGUALs, but there was a significant difference between two groups for list 1 (p=0.03). No significant differences were observed between two runs for lists 1, 3, and 5 in BILINGUALs, and two runs for lists 1, 2, and 5 were significantly correlated. There were no significant differences between the scores of lists 2, 3, and 5 in BILINGUALs (p>0.000), and a moderate correlation existed between lists 2 and 3.Conclusion: The scores of lists 2, 3, and 5 in BILINGUALs are similar to those in MONOLINGUALs. In BILINGUALs, lists 1 and 5 are reliable, and lists 2 and 3 are equivalent. The overall results indicate limitations in both RELIABILITY and equivalency of Persian Q-SIN lists in the BILINGUALs.

Cites

Development of the Persian version of high-frequency emphasis quick speech in noise

References

Cite

APA: Copy

GHEISSI, ELAHEH, FATAHI, JAMILEH, FARAHANI, SAEID, JALAIE, SHOHREH, & TAHAEI, ALI AKBAR. (2017). TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND LIST EQUIVALENCY OF PERSIAN QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST IN AZERI-PERSIAN BILINGUALS. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 26(3), 157-162. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/695811/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHEISSI ELAHEH, FATAHI JAMILEH, FARAHANI SAEID, JALAIE SHOHREH, TAHAEI ALI AKBAR. TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND LIST EQUIVALENCY OF PERSIAN QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST IN AZERI-PERSIAN BILINGUALS. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;26(3):157-162. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/695811/en

IEEE: Copy

ELAHEH GHEISSI, JAMILEH FATAHI, SAEID FARAHANI, SHOHREH JALAIE, and ALI AKBAR TAHAEI, “TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND LIST EQUIVALENCY OF PERSIAN QUICK SPEECH IN NOISE TEST IN AZERI-PERSIAN BILINGUALS,” AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/695811/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops