مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

840
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS IN THE RETENTION OF CASTING POST

Pages

  43-48

Abstract

 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are so many factors affecting the posts retention, such as length, diameter, surface, etc. Moreover, another influencing factor is canal irrigators, which are used before cementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different root canal irrigators in the retention of CASTING POST.METHODS: In this study, 80 recently extracted central teeth with the same size and shape were selected, and after root canal treatment (RCT), the canals were prepared with the same length and diameter. Post’s length was the same with the mean size of 12mm. After canal preparation, acrylic post & cores were constructed. Then spruing, investing and casting were done. Before cementation, samples were classified into 4 groups (20 cases in each group) and each group were irrigated by different root canal irrigators: group A: by normal saline, group B: hypochlorite sodium 2%, group C: citric acid 10%, group D: EDTA+ hypochlorite sodium 2%. Then the canals were dried and posts were cemented by Glass Inomer GC Fuji I. The evaluation of maximum force to push the posts out was done by Zwick machine and the diagram was traced by computer. For data analyzing, Kruskal wallis and one way ANOVA and tuckey tests were used and confidence interval was set at 95% (a= 0.05).FINDINGS: The average and standard deviation in 4 groups were: group A: 47.7±8.6 kg, group B: 46.8±9.3 kg, group C: 45.7±6.9 kg, group D: 43.9±6.8 kg. There was no significant difference between the four groups.CONCLUSION: The root canal irrigators had no influence on the retention of the CASTING POSTs which were cemented by Glass Inomer.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHAHRAMAN LOU, A., MADANI, AZAM ALSADAT, & LOTFI, H.. (2008). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS IN THE RETENTION OF CASTING POST. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 10(4 (45)), 43-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73614/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHAHRAMAN LOU A., MADANI AZAM ALSADAT, LOTFI H.. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS IN THE RETENTION OF CASTING POST. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2008;10(4 (45)):43-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73614/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. GHAHRAMAN LOU, AZAM ALSADAT MADANI, and H. LOTFI, “EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS IN THE RETENTION OF CASTING POST,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 10, no. 4 (45), pp. 43–48, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73614/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top