COMPARING THE DENTAL ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOLLOWING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF INSTRUMENTATION AND OBTURATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHODOUSI JAMILEH; MORADI SAEID; ZEBARJAD SEYED MOJTABA; JALIL ZADEH TEHRANI H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mashhad Dental School Year:2008 | Volume:31 | Issue:4 (63) Page(s): 299-306

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,084

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE DENTAL ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOLLOWING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF INSTRUMENTATION AND OBTURATION

Author(s)

GHODOUSI JAMILEH | MORADI SAEID | ZEBARJAD SEYED MOJTABA | JALIL ZADEH TEHRANI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FRACTURE STRENGTHQ3

HAND INSTRUMENTATIONQ3

ROTARY INSTRUMENTATIONQ3

ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIESQ3

ROOT FRACTUREQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Clinically, vertical ROOT FRACTURE occurs commonly in endodontically treated teeth. Previous studies have shown little changes in root FRACTURE STRENGTH following endodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was evaluation of changes in' dental ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES following two different methods of instrumention by Rotary (R) or Hand (H) files and two different methods of obturation by lateral (L) or vertical (V) technique.Materials & Methods: In this invitro study, one hundred extracted human mandibular premolars with straight root, closed apices and free of caries were selected. For the teeth to be indentical and simple to study, all teeth were decoronated 3mm above the CEJ. With making artificial PDL, all teeth were mounted in acrylic molds. Teeth were randomly distributed into four experimental groups according to the instrumentation and obturation techniques used each with a sample size of 25. HAND INSTRUMENTATION was done using stainless steel (S.S) files and Step-Back technique. ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION was done using Ni-Ti files (Race) and crown-down technique. Loading was applied using a crosshead conical tip mounted in a Zwick testing machine. The crosshead tip was initially placed into the canal orifice of each tooth, advanced vertically until it contacted the gutta-percha automatically and at a constant rate (2mm/min). ROOT FRACTURE was noted with observation of a sudden deflection in the running graph. Load to fracture was recorded in Newton (N). The energy to fracture, slope of elastic area and displacement was calculated using origin V.5.0 software through running graphs. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Duncan test.Results: Maximum mean load to fracture was observed in RL group (524 N). Minimum mean load to fracture was observed in RV (Rotary & Vertical) group (319 N). A significant difference in mean load to fracture was found between the (Rotary & Vertical) RV & (Hand & Lateral) HL, (Hand & Vertical) HV & (Rotary & Lateral) RL and (Rotary & Lateral) RL & (Rotary & Vertical) RV groups (P<0.05). Both the energy and displacement were significantly correlated with load to fracture.Conclusion: The FRACTURE STRENGTH of roots obturated through vertical compaction of gutta-percha was lower than that of lateral compaction regardless of method of instrumentation. FRACTURE STRENGTH of root was not affected by the method of instrumentation (hand or rotary).

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHODOUSI, JAMILEH, MORADI, SAEID, ZEBARJAD, SEYED MOJTABA, & JALIL ZADEH TEHRANI, H.. (2008). COMPARING THE DENTAL ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOLLOWING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF INSTRUMENTATION AND OBTURATION. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 31(4 (63)), 299-306. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73942/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHODOUSI JAMILEH, MORADI SAEID, ZEBARJAD SEYED MOJTABA, JALIL ZADEH TEHRANI H.. COMPARING THE DENTAL ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOLLOWING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF INSTRUMENTATION AND OBTURATION. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2008;31(4 (63)):299-306. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73942/en

IEEE: Copy

JAMILEH GHODOUSI, SAEID MORADI, SEYED MOJTABA ZEBARJAD, and H. JALIL ZADEH TEHRANI, “COMPARING THE DENTAL ROOT BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES FOLLOWING TWO DIFFERENT METHODS OF INSTRUMENTATION AND OBTURATION,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 31, no. 4 (63), pp. 299–306, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73942/en

Related Journal Papers